There is almost no chance of it becoming widespread. Even if it became acceptable, there's still an inherent avoidance of sexualizing close relatives. I believe it's rarity is the only reason it wouldn't cause the apocalypse you're worried about.
And I don't want you to. It just seems a bit silly to me how people go so far over such a thing. Worse things are allowed in society.Nah man you didn't upset me you just misquoted what I said. Like I said I think it's wrong and nothing will change my mind on the list of my do's and don'ts in life shagging any member of my family is firmly on the don'ts side.
Inbreeding doesn't pass on genetic defects. Because first degree relatives share 50% of their genes with one another the odds are exponentially higher that inbreeding among them will create congenital disorders. I don't know what studies you're citing but the peer reviewed studies referenced in articles I've read indicate the rate of congenital disorders is in the neighborhood of 40%. That doesn't include mild mental impairment in some of the studies which would put the figure over 50%. Many of the congenital disorders are far more severe and far less manageable then something like hemophilia, and some of them are almost guaranteed to result in death before the child reaches adulthood. That's sufficient reason to me for incest to be illegal between first degree relatives.
Thank you for that. I didn't know that the rate of disorders was so high. However, we do live in a day and age where such things can be prevented. Couples don't even need to give birth to have children, and they don't always even want any. There is also the fact that, no matter how manageable they may be today, it is still legal to perpetuate genetic diseases. I must admit I'm not clear on the difference between congenital disorders in incest and genetic disorders, but they seem functionally the same. Yet they are treated completely different.
Sorry. I don't view sarcasm as rude. If you want a serious answer, I agree in that case. It should never come to that kind of relationship.
Actually, I'm not. Over 50% of close relatives create disorders? Fine. Now why do we let people pass on brittle bone disease? I really am amazed how focused the genetics argument is. As if it's the source of every genetic problem in history.
Or, if they insist, using contraceptives. It works for everyone else.
Entire family? What exactly do you mean by that? If their parents had multiple offspring, it wouldn't be a given. If there is only one offspring, they could adopt. If they insist on keeping the blood, they could use a sperm bank ad artifical insemination. Not exactly traditional, but it works.Resulting in dying out of entire family. God job
Do you really expect 18 siblings in the same household to date and marry each other? I don't believe it's that common. But even if it was, I already listed alternatives.
There isn't a good reason to support pedophilia, though, if that's what you mean.
What about him dang it XD
Are laws going to change too :/
