Epic Keith said:
↑
2) ulfric doesn't care about the non nords in his kingdom yet he rushes to save the nords? Yet the storm cloaks claim he isn't racist.
Which only Brunwulf says, the Imperial sided would be Jarl. The Stormcloaks are nationalistic, not racist.
Right which is why the only city where racism is enforced is Windhelm. Stormcloak capital. Not to mention the comment from the Stormcloak guards about having an Orc stronghold, (which is little more than a city) being an afront to 'his' people. Might also have something to do with that being the largest Ebony supply in Skyrim and of course, the Nords are entitled to that more than the Orcs who've lived there probably since the days of Ysgramor.
Probably the biggest indicator of racism in Windhelm is the fact that Ulfric REFUSES to fix his city's problems. I say Windhelm and not Stormcloaks because if Ulfric becomes High King of Skyrim, judging by his Admin record as Jarl, and the fact that alot of the social problems in the city started with his rule, as Jarl, it's safe to say Skyrim would become similar with more racism becoming the accepted norm in Nord society and state policy.
Not to mention all of the dead, mutilated, tortured, set on fire bodies you find of Elves, Imperials and Khajits in 'Nord' bandit forts. Many of these same Nords make comments such, "Skyrim belong to the Nords" and "Your kind has no place here", which subscribes to Stormcloak doctrine. Galmar even has a problem with you joining the Stormcloaks because you're an outsider. Brunwulf says this and that about Ulfric, first meeting with Ulfric his stewart mentions the Dark Elves need help and Ulfric acts like he doesn't care.
I know there's a war on and everything... however a leader is not judged simply by War, but thru his Admin abilities as well. Why should Ulfric be 'given' Skyrim when he can't even manage his own city? How can he be trusted with protecting Nord society, when he commits treason against his country by obstructing the normal operation(s) of it's Gov?
After Torygg died, you had 9 Jarls.
4 - Pro-Imperial
4- Pro-Stormcloak
1 - Wildcard (Jarl B)
And every Jarl had a shot at becoming High King, even Ulfric. They could have had a bi-partisan Moot with everyone's political interests represented in Skyrim and just chosen a new High King from there minus all the bloodshed and the B$.
And Ulfric committed treason by refusing to allow the Moot, so in doing so, Ulfric put
his interests ahead of the
people's interests in Skyrim. And he's doing
the same thing with this fictional war with the Thalmor. The Stormcloaks in Riverwood, some of the Stormcloak Jarls, hell even Ulfric himself expresses a desire not to fight anymore on foreign soil. He gives devoutes and entire speech on it and he does the same thing during Season Unending. Only in the end after he wins does he bring this up, although the validity of that speech can be called into question because he's telling people what they want to hear.
The Nords who support Ulfric are tired of war, he expresses his hatred for fighting wars on foreign soil (1st meeting in Windhelm), Ulfric wants a self-reliant Skyrim which will stop trade with other Provinces and now all of the sudden they're going to invade the Dominion.