General Charles Xander
General of the 11th Imperial Legion
Hmmm, I guess the message didn't get erased.... weird.
So then Arianus was wrong when he said every Reachman official was killed? Well I wonder what else he was wrong about
Okay, Okay, but lets take a look at the Lore Article on the Reachmen, shall we?
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Reachmen
Nope, sorry, nothing. Don't see anything on there about Ulfric murdering Nord women and Children as well as Reachian (probably not the right way to say that) women and children, except for saying that Arianus (a man who wasn't even there I might add) said. So as far as we know its really not irrefutable evidence is it.
That was kind of my point Charles, I was saying you took the quote out of context, to make it look like the lore page had stated that. Also, "as" is appropriate conjugation to merge Arrianus' claim to the statement provided, because "as" is synonymous with "because" meaning they were saying that Arrianus claimed that Ulfric committed these atrocities. On the topic of words and wordplay and such is Xander pronounced with a "Z" sound or more like an "Sh" I'm assuming "Z"Look at the position of the comma, yep, right after "ever was made". Did you notice something in my first sentence? I performed a what's called a run-on sentence. To put it bluntly, Arrianus had nothing to do nor was involved in the second conjunction of the post.
A run-on is a sentence in which two or more independent clauses (i.e., complete sentences) are joined without appropriate punctuation or conjunction
Actually I provided your analogy with an analogy of my own.You strayed away from my question quite meekly. I asked you a question, not a possible outcome.
Right, okay, uhh tell me something, how many Barbarians live in proper villages and make due on businesses, or live in cities and do the same or houses in the woods that they built. If you're referring to the class "Barbarian" then I guess I'd have to agree with you, although there are definitely more Warrior Nords in Skyrim. Tulius certainly wasn't.Hello? Look around you, Most of the Nords ARE Barbarians. Tullius is straight-forward and to the point, he wants this act of rebellion quelled so he can move on to more oppressing matters, such as the Thalmor. There's a huge difference between lack of knowledge and personal spite. Your source of excuses is becoming exhausted.
Yep, I read "Adolf Hitler" too. Tell me something, are you aware that Judaism is a RELIGION and that to seem like you aren't Jewish you would have to HIDE YOUR RELIGION and the only way to be Jewish is if you're of the Jewish faith because they're an ETHNORELIGIOUS group of people meaning that to be a Jew you have to be of the Jewish faith. I never said Hitler killed them for their religion, I'm saying they were hunted for it. Whats the best way to tell if someone's a Jew? Figure out his/her belief system. They weren't visually identifiable if that's what you're suggesting.I said I don't want to touch on this subject, but very well. The Jews weren't hunted down because of their religion, they were hunted down because they were JEWS! They did have to get false identities, so that they hoped that they were seen as Germans and not Jews. Did Hitler say it was God's fault that they lost WW1? No, he blamed the Jews and the German people believed him. Jews were not the only people that were killed you know. All Blacks, Homosexuals, individuals with mental or physical disabilities, P.O.W.'s and Gypsies were put to death. Hitler believed in conspiracy theories that regarded the Jews as Communists and claimed that they had deliberately made Germany lose World War 1 by causing strikes, subversion and revolution on the home front. He also said that they had deliberately caused the Great Depression. Worst of all, some of these conspiracy theories claimed that the Jews were seeking world domination and were therefore in competition with Germany's bid to dominate the world. So no, you were completely wrong. Yes, you did try to compare them together, why else would you bring it up? Research. Please!
Why? I'm not generalizing Nords half of them obviously behave this way. Pride counts to the Nords when they're dead, because if you don't die staring death in the face, guess where you're not going? Sovngarde, the most sought after place in all of Nordic society. Y'know for someone who claims to be a Nord you don't seem to know a lot about your main character's culture. Just an observation.You know, you reminded me of a very fitting quote in a film I watched. Guy 1: "What's the point of living if it means throwing away your pride?!" Guy 2: "You're a strange one all right, but pride doesn't count for much when your dead..you know?" Now you are just generalizing Nords again. If hiding your religion is cowardly to them, then I respect the ones who choose cowardice over undeniable death.
Okay I explained the Nord part already, the Stormcloaks clearly think this way, I'm not generalizing I'm observing, and learning about, the people that are my favorite TES race. As for the Shrines, did you really just say that? Well not everybody has a shrine in their house, you built your house and built some shrines so you have shrines, Most people don't have shrines in their home, and can't receive blessings. Also I'm pretty sure the Shrine working just fine is because of player convenience. You'd most likely have to get that blessed by a priest. And guess what, those Shrines are being watched by the Thalmor. Need proof, here you go:There you are still generalizing the Nords. Not all of the Nords share the same views as the Stormcloaks, so it's wrong to put them all into the same category like that. Also, you HAVE to go to a shrine to receive blessings? Last time I checked, all of the shrines in my house worked perfectly fine and gave me the correct blessings. There are also plenty of shrines scattered across Skyrim that don't have any temple or statue that still give out blessings.
The dominion is compromised of a hell of a lot more than the Thalmor. Yes the Thalmor are bad, but do you think the Empire really had a say in who could or could not enforce the treaty? Plus, when they say that they are keeping the Dominion out, they (obviously) mean the Dominion military forces. I think YOU should drop it because it is personally not a relevant argument, because it is quite obvious.
He said this "What the rebels like to forget, is that the Empire is the only thing keeping the Dominion out of Skyrim." meanwhile this is happening everyday:"What the rebels like to forget, is that the Empire is the only thing keeping the Dominion out of Skyrim." How does that mean anything different than it already says? Oh yes, the Empire is BSing about the keeping the Dominion out of Skyrim. Because OBVIOUSLY the Dominion military is occupying Skyrim right now! How could I and everyone else been so blind? Pathetic excuse of an attempted argument. Yes the Thalmor are part of the Dominion, but they are not THE Dominion as you are generalizing them to be.
Are you saying you don't know about all of the people that were kidnapped for worshiping Talos? secretly by the way. Pretty much one of the main reasons the Stormcloaks are fighting?What are you talking about? What people? You are making 0 sense again. Please explain.
I believe it was your 2nd post in this argument. It should about 1 page away.Referring back to what exactly?
No we don't know for certain. You just say it's certain because it's written in a book aimed at discrediting the Stormcloaks. Another bunch of pages of Imperial Loyalist pulling 'facts' out of thin air and people repeating what Drunkmage writes because they can't think for them selves.. *sigh*So then Arianus was wrong when he said every Reachman official was killed? Well I wonder what else he was wrong about
Regarding shady deals, it is unlikely he'd know about that. If you can show me other figures that Silver-Bloods spared...
Okay, Okay, but lets take a look at the Lore Article on the Reachmen, shall we?
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Reachmen
Nope, sorry, nothing. Don't see anything on there about Ulfric murdering Nord women and Children as well as Reachian (probably not the right way to say that) women and children, except for saying that Arianus (a man who wasn't even there I might add) said. So as far as we know its really not irrefutable evidence is it.
Helps if you look at the right page...
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Forsworn
Many historical volumes in TES are written by "people who weren't there" yet you accept them?
I could throw up the Khajiit lore page and go on about how nothing mentions the slaughter of innocent civilians, including children during the Tiber Wars.
Unless you have someone saying "Those executions didn't happen" or another book contradicting. People not speaking about it doesn't mean pl***. We know for certain people were getting executed for being associated with the Forsworn.
"The Nords didn't care who was and who wasn't involved in the Forsworn Uprising." - Braig
No we don't know for certain. You just say it's certain because it's written in a book aimed at discrediting the Stormcloaks. Another bunch of pages of Imperial Loyalist pulling 'facts' out of thin air and people repeating what Drunkmage writes because they can't think for them selves.. *sigh*So then Arianus was wrong when he said every Reachman official was killed? Well I wonder what else he was wrong about
Regarding shady deals, it is unlikely he'd know about that. If you can show me other figures that Silver-Bloods spared...
Okay, Okay, but lets take a look at the Lore Article on the Reachmen, shall we?
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Reachmen
Nope, sorry, nothing. Don't see anything on there about Ulfric murdering Nord women and Children as well as Reachian (probably not the right way to say that) women and children, except for saying that Arianus (a man who wasn't even there I might add) said. So as far as we know its really not irrefutable evidence is it.
Helps if you look at the right page...
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Forsworn
Many historical volumes in TES are written by "people who weren't there" yet you accept them?
I could throw up the Khajiit lore page and go on about how nothing mentions the slaughter of innocent civilians, including children during the Tiber Wars.
Unless you have someone saying "Those executions didn't happen" or another book contradicting. People not speaking about it doesn't mean pl***. We know for certain people were getting executed for being associated with the Forsworn.
"The Nords didn't care who was and who wasn't involved in the Forsworn Uprising." - Braig
I can accept anything that is proven with facts, not a book written purely for propoganda purposes due to the result of Imperial cowardice and betrayal during the Markarth Incident. They had to make it look like what they did to Ulfric and his Militia was justified, easiest way to do that is to spread rumours he's a child killer etc etc. And the Jarl issue, he is an Imperial Jarl according to Drunkenmage, but then when situations arise that damages the Empire's image, he's all of a sudden independent. You can hate Ulfric and everything he stands for, but it's obvious he isn't the type of man to murder women and children just for the sake of it.No we don't know for certain. You just say it's certain because it's written in a book aimed at discrediting the Stormcloaks. Another bunch of pages of Imperial Loyalist pulling 'facts' out of thin air and people repeating what Drunkmage writes because they can't think for them selves.. *sigh*Regarding shady deals, it is unlikely he'd know about that. If you can show me other figures that Silver-Bloods spared...
Helps if you look at the right page...
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Forsworn
Many historical volumes in TES are written by "people who weren't there" yet you accept them?
I could throw up the Khajiit lore page and go on about how nothing mentions the slaughter of innocent civilians, including children during the Tiber Wars.
Unless you have someone saying "Those executions didn't happen" or another book contradicting. People not speaking about it doesn't mean pl***. We know for certain people were getting executed for being associated with the Forsworn.
"The Nords didn't care who was and who wasn't involved in the Forsworn Uprising." - Braig
Question for you. Why, is it so bad to hear the Imperials side of the Markarth Incident? I mean, the Empire didn't make the deal with Ulfric they were left with the bill once the new Jarl decided he'd rather turn the city over to the Empire as opposed to facing the Thalmor. So, we hear the Stormcloaks side of everything, I would think the Imperials version of events should be just as important.
Of course, that's prob one reason why ya'll can't get along
No we don't know for certain. You just say it's certain because it's written in a book aimed at discrediting the Stormcloaks. Another bunch of pages of Imperial Loyalist pulling 'facts' out of thin air and people repeating what Drunkmage writes because they can't think for them selves.. *sigh*
I can accept anything that is proven with facts, not a book written purely for propoganda purposes due to the result of Imperial cowardice and betrayal during the Markarth Incident. They had to make it look like what they did to Ulfric and his Militia was justified, easiest way to do that is to spread rumours he's a child killer etc etc.
And the Jarl issue, he is an Imperial Jarl according to Drunkenmage, but then when situations arise that damages the Empire's image, he's all of a sudden independent. You can hate Ulfric and everything he stands for, but it's obvious he isn't the type of man to murder women and children just for the sake of it.
I can accept anything that is proven with facts, not a book written purely for propoganda purposes due to the result of Imperial cowardice and betrayal during the Markarth Incident. They had to make it look like what they did to Ulfric and his Militia was justified, easiest way to do that is to spread rumours he's a child killer etc etc.
And the Jarl issue, he is an Imperial Jarl according to Drunkenmage, but then when situations arise that damages the Empire's image, he's all of a sudden independent. You can hate Ulfric and everything he stands for, but it's obvious he isn't the type of man to murder women and children just for the sake of it.
And at the start of the game, the PC is seconds away from receiving the same treatment from the Empire that you're trying to degrade Ulfric for..
"Nords kill non forsworn, so bad!!" "Empire attempts to kill non Stormcloak, that's fine"
Propaganda's main goal isn't to make your side look good, it's to make the other side look bad so the people make their own 'choice' that your side is good.
Can you not see how painfully obvious it is that the Empire is being played just as much as Ulfric lol.. And do you blame Nords for taking a dislike to magic? Nearly every encounter they've had with magical races or magic in general ends in disaster, Winterhold is a mess because of the College, and the college once again very nearly wipes out Winterhold.
And do you blame Nords for taking a dislike to magic?
So are you a spellsword? Or are you just a pure Mage?And do you blame Nords for taking a dislike to magic?
It isn't just Nords, we Mages suffer from accusations from simpletons everywhere! As Divayth Fyr once commented: As far as they are concerned, every manipulator of magicka is just waiting for midnight before skulking off to the cemetery to animate the corpses of their neighbors and ancestors.
I did not spend hundreds of hours mastering my wizardry to be told to "Cast my fancy magic some place else"
They don't like us now, it's all "Go away evil magic user!" But when they want something, oh different story. "Save us from the Daedra! Enchant this! Heal me! Why is my wife a goat?!" (Though that last one may have been me using Sheo's staff...)
If we left, you savages would start warring over firewood and sacrifice animals anytime the sun sets to bring it back.
Anyway, on a serious note.
At least Jarl Kraldar at least is willing to try to repair relations with the College, and he is Mage friendly. He also is willing to try rebuild Winterhold, instead of sulking.
"With the Empire's help, Winterhold will be back on its feet in no time." and "There's yet hope that our relationship with the College can be repaired."
As an extremely Mage favored player in fantasy settings, I support all Mage friendly people.
So are you a spellsword? Or are you just a pure Mage?
Oooo, I like the new sig. You should give us a picture of your character so I can get a better idea of you. Right now, all I can see is Lieutenant Maro with spells in each hand.So are you a spellsword? Or are you just a pure Mage?
Pure Mage of course.
Repost due to some odd error.
So Jarl Skald the Elder represents Ulfric's leadership? The Silver-Bloods using Forsworn as assassins, who use mercenaries to bully land owners and extort shop keepers. Represent Ulfric too? What about Dengeir who gets you to break into someone's house against the law, do the Stormcloaks value freedom until paranoia gets the better of them?
The High King of Skyrim represents the Empire and Imperial authority. The rest of Skyrim doesn't often have high Imperial authority and the Jarls obey the High King. They have a duty to uphold the law, but Jarl Hrolfdir and his son were deposed, and by Igmund's own account they became desperate.
Jarls can't represent three entire provinces, they're nobles who own a Hold.
Because it was their home, and they were kicked out of it. If someone took your house by force, kicked you and your family out. Wouldn't you want it back?
Yes, use the Mage. Court Wizards don't care who is in charge. Though you are right in saying that many citizens don't care who is in charge because they've never had a say anyway.
It is you Stormcloaks who have this horrible problem with denying that anything like this could happen, because it would ruin why people should join the Stormcloaks. It doesn't. All it does is just show that no faction is a saint.
Why do people always try to win a lore battle against @DrunkenMage? Don't people know that there is no winning against someone who knows what they are talking about?