DrunkenMage
Intoxicated Arch-Mage
guards do comment, asking about it...sort of.
They just say the Emperor of Skyrim is dead.
guards do comment, asking about it...sort of.
guards do comment, asking about it...sort of.
They just say the Emperor of Skyrim is dead.
I remember the guards asking me if I was a member of the Dark Brotherhood.
I remember the guards asking me if I was a member of the Dark Brotherhood.
They also say Hail Sithis. Guards in Windhelm are pussies though, won't go near the boy doing the Black Sacrament. In Cyrodiil you know what the Legion does? They kick in your door, drag you out and then they take your home, they take your possessions, they put you in jail for the rest of your life. Your house then is donated to the Legion to serve as an outpost.
No execution? and here I thought the Legion were execution happy.
These were the dialogue that came from the guards. They knew exactly who you are and what you did. If the guards know I sure as hell hope the Imperial Legion from Skyrim knows, they should anyways.
Esp once it hit me that Talos worship among other liberties were still allowed for all to enjoy in Whiterun... of all places. And the Dominion never bothered them... neither did the Empire.
That said, OOC, this is the reason I just can't side with the Empire. There's a powerful political faction IRL that would quite love to imprison or kill every single member of my religion. The quest to find and free Thorold Grey-Mane sends shivers up my spine-- saying that the open shrine of Talos in Whiterun or the existence of the Emperor's secret amulet somehow obviate the need for a rebellion just... there's a foreign power allowed to operate with impunity and detain, imprison, or torture any citizen that it chooses simply for their religious beliefs. An open shrine doesn't somehow make that less real. If you go to said shrine, you take your life in your hands. Is there someone spying on you? How do you know there isn't? You have family and friends who've had someone taken, so is this a risk you feel comfortable taking? You can make good, damn good arguments against the Stormcloaks, and I think they're all valid, but this is the thing I can't get past. (It also doesn't help that the real-life faction I'm talking about are called "Dominionists" and the one in-game is, of course, the Dominion. I set it aside to roleplay and generally manage to succeed, but my reaction to Thalmor torture is sometimes pretty visceral.)
We have, for over a year now debated this point of yours Raijin, for the history of this thread we have discussed this defense of yours to defend Ulfric Stormcloak's cause, the True Usurper of The High Throne of Skyrim.No execution? and here I thought the Legion were execution happy.
because you were with stormcloaks, and that makes you guilty of something to do with the stormcloaks even though there is no record of anything to do with stormcloaks.
That doesn't matter, it is how law works in Tamriel.
and DrunkenMage: Why is there not a C) Lock the PC up and try to figure out why he/she was on the cart? Unless the captain did not care for the truth and was looking for an excuse to kill some random.
Because you're already guilty. The crime to be executed isn't your minor assault. You're on the cart, why would she lock you up? Because your name wasn't recorded prior to standing in front of her?
The Captain's truth was simple. You're guilty. By law, you're guilty, understand that. You have no legal rights, so why would they lock you away. You're facing summary execution, it's either you have some defense this second, or off to the block. I have repeated myself several times now.
So I will make it bold, so it can sink into your head.
If a member of the Elder Council, who was also put in the exact same situation as the player. He had no evidence, other than his word. He was executed. So why would you, suspected of treason. Be given special treatment, taken for some interrogation. For the exact same outcome, to get executed. Because? Your word, isn't evidence.
Now we have you, who has got it into his mind. That when saying you're innocent without evidence is some kind of valid excuse? Never become a judge.
"I can't be executed. You see, in my opinion, I'm actually innocent."
Guilty of what? Being in the same vicinity as rebels? Some woman's accusations that you are a rebel who is not a rebel? What is the crime other than being caught in an ambush by crazy imperials?
We are all guilty of crossing the border, but that is not what it is, right? Then everything magically goes away when we escape.
SO the innocence in proven once the captain is dead and there is nobody else accusing you of being anything.
That doesn't matter, it is how law works in Tamriel.
Because you're already guilty. The crime to be executed isn't your minor assault. You're on the cart, why would she lock you up? Because your name wasn't recorded prior to standing in front of her?
The Captain's truth was simple. You're guilty. By law, you're guilty, understand that. You have no legal rights, so why would they lock you away. You're facing summary execution, it's either you have some defense this second, or off to the block. I have repeated myself several times now.
So I will make it bold, so it can sink into your head.
If a member of the Elder Council, who was also put in the exact same situation as the player. He had no evidence, other than his word. He was executed. So why would you, suspected of treason. Be given special treatment, taken for some interrogation. For the exact same outcome, to get executed. Because? Your word, isn't evidence.
Now we have you, who has got it into his mind. That when saying you're innocent without evidence is some kind of valid excuse? Never become a judge.
"I can't be executed. You see, in my opinion, I'm actually innocent."
Guilty of what? Being in the same vicinity as rebels? Some woman's accusations that you are a rebel who is not a rebel? What is the crime other than being caught in an ambush by crazy imperials?
We are all guilty of crossing the border, but that is not what it is, right? Then everything magically goes away when we escape.
SO the innocence in proven once the captain is dead and there is nobody else accusing you of being anything.
Please stop repeating yourself when your repeated question is answered constantly.
The Dragonborn is found alongside Ulfric Stormcloak and his top lieutenants in the wilderness prior to being caught by the Imperials. From this, the Dragonborn is guilty for being a Stormcloak, from the Imperials perspective. Same with Lokir. The only possible evidence that could show otherwise, is an explanation from either the other Stormcloaks, or the Dragonborn himself. However, as shown by Lokir's murder, it's highly unlikely that that would be accepted. But either way, nothing of the sorts is provided.
This is all because of Tamrielic law, that states a criminal is "guilty until proven innocent." Meaning that a person is automatically guilty of a crime if suspected, and is only proven by specific, hard evidence that says otherwise (not yelling "We aren't Stormcloaks, this is a mistake!"), according to the book Legal Basics. Whatever that evidence for innocence may be, I am unsure.
Talos, as we all know, was not a God. I don't worship people. Hell no. I don't even worship a God anyhow.
Talos, as we all know, was not a God. I don't worship people. Hell no. I don't even worship a God anyhow.
I agree with a lot of the stuff that has been said in your post - Except for the tiny little part I just quoted.
You may think it is lame that a person becomes a deity after his death (I can totally understand that), but Talos is an actual ingame God. If he wouldn't be real, his shrine wouldn't cure diseases and his amulet wouldn't have any effect on us. We don't see him in the Hall of Valor either when you visit Sovngarde. I mean, all the heroes mentioned in the game are there. Except for Talos. Why? Because he is a God and doesn't live amongst men in the afterlife.
Yet the Aldmeri Domion wants the worship of Talos to be banned. To understand that, we must first understand that the Aldmeri religion forms the basis for most of the other religious practices on the continent, primarily due to its widespread acceptance prior to the advent of human civilization.
The Aldmeri Dominion thinks that acknowledging a mortal as a deity is a violation of their pantheon.
I personally believe in freedom of religion. A person should be able to worship a turd, if that makes him happy. But I agree with you 100% that the White-Gold Concordat was the best thing to do at that time under those circumstances.
Talos, as we all know, was not a God. I don't worship people. Hell no. I don't even worship a God anyhow.
I agree with a lot of the stuff that has been said in your post - Except for the tiny little part I just quoted.
You may think it is lame that a person becomes a deity after his death (I can totally understand that), but Talos is an actual ingame God. If he wouldn't be real, his shrine wouldn't cure diseases and his amulet wouldn't have any effect on us. We don't see him in the Hall of Valor either when you visit Sovngarde. I mean, all the heroes mentioned in the game are there. Except for Talos. Why? Because he is a God and doesn't live amongst men in the afterlife.
Yet the Aldmeri Domion wants the worship of Talos to be banned. To understand that, we must first understand that the Aldmeri religion forms the basis for most of the other religious practices on the continent, primarily due to its widespread acceptance prior to the advent of human civilization.
The Aldmeri Dominion thinks that acknowledging a mortal as a deity is a violation of their pantheon.
I personally believe in freedom of religion. A person should be able to worship a turd, if that makes him happy. But I agree with you 100% that the White-Gold Concordat was the best thing to do at that time under those circumstances.
You realize that TES is essentially a god's dream right? That means anything can and does happen.
According to that logic every scenario you mention could happen. 'What if a goat becomes the new High King of Skyrim?'. Valid story because we are in a dream.
I think you have to draw a line somewhere and take a look at what is likely to happen or unlikely. I don't think that "everything is possible in a dream" means that whatever theory you have about Skyrim's future is decent.
Talos is a God according to TES lore. I explained above why.
According to that logic every scenario you mention could happen. 'What if a goat becomes the new High King of Skyrim?'. Valid story because we are in a dream.
I think you have to draw a line somewhere and take a look at what is likely to happen or unlikely. I don't think that "everything is possible in a dream" means that whatever theory you have about Skyrim's future is decent.
Talos is a God according to TES lore. I explained above why.
Talos is a god, only because people believe. faith is a powerful thing. no faith means you would not pray at his shrine which means you would have him blessing you, which means he has no real power.
Daedric princes are the same way. Their power is only there if people believe and observe it.