If you want to put it that way yeah
To my understanding Court wizards have an obligation to protect their holds against any threat. Since Farengar was already studying dragons it would've been a great opportunity for him to collect blood/scales/etc samples from the recently deceased dragon that way he could be at least helpful and not some annoying fop. Instead of sending Farengar out to fight the dragon Balgruuf sends an unknown person to fight this dragon. IMO thats ridiculous. I do give him credit sending Irileth was helpful but so was sending Farengar. Fighting Dragons with low level and on master can be quite a challenging.
They have a responsibility to the Jarls and their Holds, indeed. And they are to serve as counsel for the Jarls and to aid them as they are called upon. If you recall, it's Balgruuf and Co's first encounter with a dragon. No one knows what to expect. Balgruuf wants you to go because, I dunno, maybe it has something to do with the fact that you've been down this road before. You're the only one in the room with
experience. Gauging one's actions wisely and calmly and rationally is the sign of a thoughtful leader. And him keeping Farengar back makes sense to me as much as it confounds you. Farengar has his role to serve; it simply wasn't out on the front lines in the very first battle. If you remember, he managed to show up during the Odahviing trapping to get "samples"....and we know how that went for him.
With each new character that I create I find things that I never seen on my previous characters. I then start to put the puzzle together. I am quite curious to read the history between him and Ulfric. I firmly believe that he used the empire to get back at Ulfric for a possible selfish reasons. Maybe hes jealous of Ulfrics success? After all Ulfric manage to successfully learn the ancient tongues while Balgruuf had failed.
Are you really suggesting that Balgruuf is
that petty? I've seen absolutely no sign of that. Even if he does have a longstanding grievance with the man, he still sees the bigger picture (something the Stormcloaks collectively don't do much of, frankly). He's got the welfare of his people in mind, as well as that of the entirety of his homeland. He's not an overenthusiastic cheerleader for the Empire, by the way. When he speaks of it, he speaks rather pragmatically and never once is there any slip of the tongue to the effect of, "OMG, that bitch Ulfric? I'm SO gonna get his ass back for all the BS!". If you hear that, you're either playing a different game with different dialogue or you're allowing yourself to read way too much into it all. Or you're just hearing things.
Base on what I've seen in Windhelm I don't think Ulfric is one of the worst Jarls in skyrim. Perhaps the civil war is turning him into a bad jarl, but not the worst or one of the worst.
Considering that the policy has been in place for many years and things have apparently only worsened under his rule, which predates the start of the war, I'd say his asshole nature has been with him for quite some time. War can change people for the worse and I've no doubt that has happened with him to some extent. However I'm not naive enough to think all of his racial apathy and bitterness and pride sprang up overnight.
Like you I too made a fair evaluation of each Jarls. I started doing it when I first started playing the game so I was unbiased at the time. While Ulfric does have his darksides the fact to the matter is hes known for getting things done. And yes Markarth was his trump card in spite of what I truly feel about it, and how Igmund was just a power hungry politician that was driven by power for wanting to get back into the game, and wanting people to see just how important he is. I feel that Markarth was his golden years. I'm sure the Empire appreciates Ulfric for saving them the hassle of wasting men by retaking back the reach.
If you truly want my RL opinion about Ulfric hes just another religious nut that needs to be institutionalized for a period of time to get proper treatment, however in the game (Gods are real) I admire him for standing up for what he truly believes in. Ulfric isn't the only one that hates the empire for banning the worship of Talos.
As I've said several times now, Igmund is no saint. I don't think anyone here has ever claimed as much. He made a deal he thought was right at the time, in order to help save his city which was lacking Legion support due to the Great War and was actively being besieged by the Reachmen. He made the deal to save lives. Yeah, it wound up backfiring in the long term, it's true. And in subsequent years his image hasn't necessarily improved. But once again, that has
nothing to do with Ulfric being any less of a jerk and an unfit ruler.
Ulfric can't see the bigger picture because of his pride and his egocentrism. That's not an opinion I'm pulling out of the air, it's founded entirely upon observation of him, his dialogue and the circumstances he presides over.
I'm not exactly sure what you meant when you said that Ulfric killed an untold amount of his own people across Skyrim. You must elaborate me on this as this is new. And don't mention Bear of Markarth because that has been debated countless of times already.
Blood on one's hands - the phrase (which you first used) strongly implies responsibility, not necessarily that Ulfric
personally ran around slaying his kinsmen. He put the events in motion for it and has championed the continuation of them. The civil war, which he began by killing Torygg (this was part of his strategic
plan, he admits that), if you haven't noticed, has pit Nord against Nord. When you're killing Legionnaires, that's who you're
often (though not always) killing - not Cyrodiil-born soldiers. Any "true sons and daughters of Skyrim" shouldn't be so glib about the war, and so overly eager to canonize Ulfric for it. They're destroying themselves, arguably for one man's personal crusade. And it's all quite tragic. Especially given that the only ones who really win with such destabilization occurring are in fact the Thalmor. And
everyone in Tamriel will have to pay the price.
And of course you don't want to get into the Bear of Markarth, because
Dagmar and
Mr.Self Destruct have done wonderfully to remind you why it's relevant - as much as you and other Ulfric apologists like to pretend it's not.
Thats not what many NPCs are saying about Ulfric
Damn, stop the presses, Stormcloak sympathizing NPCs kiss Ulfric's ass! I can't believe it! I guess this changes everything I thought about this game!
...Many NPCs also say that what you and others say about the Empire is BS - so what?
All of this and those poor Dark elves have a bed and shelter to sleep in. Shame on Ulfric for letting them live in the “slum” shame on him for providing shelter for the immigrants of Morrowind.
Oh yeah, how nice of him to continue to confine people to a slum based on their race alone. How nice of him to disallow opportunities for them to improve their environment there, to contribute even more robustly to the local economy.
And I personally highly doubt he's "providing shelter" like a poor house. I have every suspicion that they're paying their bills in some fashion. Why, you ask? Oh, because, I have a feeling that Ulfric wouldn't tolerate squatters in his city. It'd be all the reason he needed to formally kick them out.
But yeah, guys, didn't you know? They have a roof over their heads so racism is
totally valid.
No the die-hards won't take kindly to that, but who's the boss around here? They or Brunwulf? If they conduct violence against the Argonians you take the offenders straight to jail for a certain amount of days. If they murder one then arrest and then sentence them to the chopping block. Residents wont respect you if your soft and fluffy. Besides the architecture of the building can not sustain them, unless if Brunwulf actually allows them to live inside the palace of the kings, and IMO I don't think even that kind hearted Brunwulf would let that happen.
It's extremely naive to think that if the Argonians were brought in and there were riots, that that wouldn't escalate quickly in all sorts of ways. I applaud Brunwulf for seeing the danger and acting cautiously and rationally before violence theoretically broke out. Brunwulf isn't Jesus, as much as I commend the man's intentions and actions. If troublemakers and angry citizens with pitchforks and swords get stirred up by their status quo suddenly changing again, right after Ulfric's death, you really think that those who want to express their anger in a violent manner won't do so? I would bet that even Ulfric probably didn't like the optics of racist idiots like Rolff running around the Gray Quarter and spouting his vitriol - because it didn't reflect well. But Rolff clearly didn't care, he acted on his hateful, spiteful impulses. And
that, ladies and gents, is what Brunwulf fears with too much change at once.
And seeing as Brunwulf fully intends to bring the Argonians back in and said nothing of hesitance on the part of lack of space, I think, again, we should put that notion aside. It's all about keeping his people,
all of his people, as safe as possible.
At least we can agree to something
It is our prerogative to maintain our personal opinions regarding to Skyrim political and emotion feelings towards Ulfric. We both would be wasting each other time trying to convince each other otherwise because it will never change no matter what we say
And yet, we keep arguing. Why is that?
I never thought of her playing any kind of role of ancient Greek. It's funny that you said that because my current Breton was built to resemble the ancient Egyptian gods Ra/Horus = Ra-Horakhty
Ancient history and mythology FTW.
I'm an historian of ancient Rome first and foremost, but I dabble in Egyptology. Good stuff!