I swore to liberate Skyrim. That I did. Now I am using legal means to atain power. Breaking oath would be creating your own "army" and attacking him without issuing a challenge.
Strongest rules in new Skyrim, and I am the mightiest in this world
Skyrim belongs to M'aiq.
No, you swore fealty to Ulfric Stormcloak and acknowledged his claim as the true High King. Challenging him for said title is a violation of your oath.
That is the most ridiculous statement.....look up Daedra.With power to rival a Daedra.
I am the best for Skyrim, and I will have it, one way or the other.
And I like it!You Swore to Ulfric, unless galmar gave you a special oath, so anything you do against him is breaking said Oath. This is a special oath it's not the Fealty the Jarls swear to the High King this is directly to the man, not the position.
What an brutish way of thinking.
"Real strength is have power and choosing not to use it"
Nope. And you just came to push contra-arguments to me.
I said, after solitute. I will let him be High King for those 30 seconds. I have a right to challenge.
Just like he had right with Toryg
I tried that, they just won't accept it....they must have been pushing the cross fingers button or something.I do swear my blood and
honor to the service of Ulfric Stormcloak
Jarl of Windhelm and true High King of Skyrim.
As Talos is my witness, may this oath bind me
to death and beyond...
...even to my lord as to my fellow brothers
and sisters in arms.
All hail the Stormcloaks, the true sons
and daughters of Skyrim!
Emphasis mine. Now, whether you believe that you have that right or not is up to you, but by doing so you will be violating the above oath.
I do swear my blood and
honor to the service of Ulfric Stormcloak
Jarl of Windhelm and true High King of Skyrim.
As Talos is my witness, may this oath bind me
to death and beyond...
...even to my lord as to my fellow brothers
and sisters in arms.
All hail the Stormcloaks, the true sons
and daughters of Skyrim!
Emphasis mine. Now, whether you believe that you have that right or not is up to you, but by doing so you will be violating the above oath.
I tried that, they just won't accept it....they must have been pushing the cross fingers button or something.
Weird how imperials are now trying to bind Dragonborn from archieving his destiny.
They prefer Ulfric on the throne to Dragonborn hahahahh
and completing Liberation of Skyrim gives you a 20 point bonus.
There should be a perk tree just for betrayal.
Weird how imperials are now trying to bind Dragonborn from archieving his destiny.
They prefer Ulfric on the throne to Dragonborn hahahahh
And that would be my first 100 and legendized 5x before I got to level 50!
There should be a perk tree just for betrayal.
I was about to define "even".....
and completing Liberation of Skyrim gives you a 20 point bonus.
I'd prefer Ulfric's head on my sword.
Since when do you have to be Lawful Good to swear an oath? An oath is just a promise that you don't intend to keep.The word 'even' is not a modifier. Again, it is cool if you want to imagine yourself usurping Ulfric, but you are still violating the oath. So, yes, you can imagine your Dragonborn as high king, but you cannot do so and remain of the Lawful Good alignment after swearing that oath.
Since when do you have to be Lawful Good to swear an oath? An oath is just a promise that you don't intend to keep.
and what would your first act as High King be hmm? Attack the Thalmor? The Empire? Free cheese for everyone?And so I shall sit on the throne as lawfull king of Skyrim
MUAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
They claimed the Stormcloaks were about "honor" there is no honor in breaking an OathSince when do you have to be Lawful Good to swear an oath? An oath is just a promise that you don't intend to keep.
If Skyrim doesn't belong to the Stormcloaks, why would it belong to their wives?Apparently, y'all haven't spent enough time on the northern shore to know that Skyrim really belongs to these fat bastards
Bloody fluffers are everywhere...