That's not what I'm saying, clearly, as anyone who has basic reading comprehension skills should know. When you say you like something and someone disagrees with it, a debate ensues. Your job is to prove your opinion superior over the other. You do that by backing up your points with facts, or things you have seen, in this case, things from the game. As the person above so kindly pointed out, A Vampire Lord can simply throw a Werewolf off a Mountain, which I myself have done several times. With Supernatural Reflexes, the Vampire Lord is far faster then the Werewolf, it could tear the poor wolf to shreds in a matter of seconds. So, you see, I've successfully backed up my opinion with points and facts from the game, it's your turn, or someone else s to do the same.
Now, no matter how much I point out to someone how much better the Vampire Lord is, that doesn't mean anything if they still prefer to be a Werewolf, which is completely fine, Werewolves are awesome. However, what I've just disproved is the notion that Vampires suck, or aren't any better then the Werewolf. That was what I was arguing against, that was what I was trying to prove false.
Also, you do realize that the Vampire Lord get's several pieces of equipment that make him better, yes? You do realizes that it matters not how much times a Werewolf can turn, because a Vampire Lord can turn as many times as he wishes to? You do realize that a Vampire Lord can summon two gargoyles if he really wanted to? You do realize that a Vampire Lord can just throw those wolves off a cliff, rendering their perks and such useless? I hope so.