feliciano182
Well-Known Member
I didn't say that every Khajiit in Tamriel is a Skooma user or dealer. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Oblivion had some Khajiit that had no Skooma upon their person. I'm also not saying I think it's right to do. But I'm saying that it's Skyrim's way of doing it.
You implied that, since all Khajiit in the game carry skooma, then it is reasonable for the jarls to apply discriminating policies, the problem with that argument is that you assume these policies are applied due to concerns about "a skooma problem", of which there's no basis nor proof for it whatsoever; in contrast, we have the proven dislike of nords towards Khajiit citizens in Skyrim, we know that many traditionalist nords are racist towards "the beast races", the logical conclussion would be to assume that Khajiit are not allowed in the cities because nords dislike them, anything else is conjecture and supposition, or in your case, rationalization for both nord and stormcloak actions.
I'm sure if they had modern screening technology like we do now, then they'd be happy to let anyone in after they've been through security checks.
Proof ? None, again, conjecture and supposition.
And if this were the middle ages, you can bet America would have a stricter border policy. Of course modern nations like America didn't exist back then, so why do these modern standards apply to Skyrim?
It would still be racist policy, which you apparently approve.
We're not supposed to judge this game as if racism was the correct, morally decent path, nobody assumes a "medieval mindset" when playing the game, all the content related to racism in the story is MEANT to be judged with modern ethics.
And I haven't got a racist bone in my body.
Your arguments contradict you every single time.
What I think you're doing is applying modern values on medieval people. This policy of not allowing people of a certain race into the city walls wasn't exactly uncommon in the middle ages. Hell, it took until the 1960's until my country allowed non-white people in. Of course,As far as medieval societies go, Skyrim is pretty damn progressive. And as far as I can tell, I never said "It's a great idea to not allow Khajiit in the city", I just said "I can see why they did it, despite it being wrong."
As I said, the game is meant to be looked upon with our current ethics, and under the premise that inmoral behavior trascends time and subjective judgement, nobody at Bethesda is going to ask you to "assume a medieval, backwards mentality", they're going to ask you "Here, as you are, and with what you know, what do you think of "x" situation ? What do you think of "y" treatment ? Do you approve ? Do your dissaprove ?"
Agreed, but historically there's been more racism shown by the Dunmer than the Nords, especially towards the Argonians, who they used as slaves. So I tend to think that the Dunmer have something to do with the Argonians living outside the walls aswell.
It's a petty (as well as pointless) argument to say there's "more or less" racism here or there, racism is racism, when it appears it's wrong, nobody is "worse" for having more time being prejudiced, and it doesn't excuse the mentality and the policies of Windhelm and the stormcloaks.
Yeah, that's true. Except that his city is under constant threat from an Imperial attack and there isn't a single Dunmer who's put the tiniest bit of effort into helping the defence.
First, unfounded, prejudiced, drunken accusations are never meant to be taken seriously.
Second, the dunmer don't have to help the war effort a single bit, and neither do they deserve to be treated like crap nor accused of nonsense by a well-accomodated idiot.
It's definitely not good enough reason to do the crap that he does. But he isn't doing it for a laugh. I know he's hard to listen to, but if you listen to him, he does have his reasons. Poor reasons, but reasons none the less.
That's not how logic works, if your reasons for doing something are poor, then they are completely invalid, we never say "Well that guy doesn't make any goddamn sense, but he sure has his reasons !".
I'm glad you bring this up though. Since the Americans were terribly racist towards the Japanese during WWII, does this mean that the Japanese were actually the right side in the war, and the bad guys were actually the Americans? Because one of the main arguments against the Stormcloaks is that they're racist.
"The Japanese" is an improper term to describe The Empire Of Japan, as is "The Nords" when speaking of The Stormcloaks.
Apart from that, no idea why bring you this up.
And Ambarys may not be a spy but he's clearly an Imperial supporter. If he's allowed to get away with it but no-one can get away with vocally supporting the Stormcloaks without being executed (Roggvir) or hauled away by the Thalmor (Thorald Grey-Mane), then what does that say about the so-called tolerance and fairness of the Empire?
If those situations say anything, it's about Tullius' or Aldis' methods of dictating justice and "sending out messages", they speak of The Cyrodilic Empire as much as George Patton's slapping of a traumatized soldier did of the US army in WWII.
Aside from that, the truth is simple, The Empire is known to be tolerant of all races and all walks of life, policies and discriminative actions against other groups are completely outside of what is known of them.
But there's proof of at least the Cornerclub at least being sympathetic towards the empire. I'd say it's things like this that make Ulfric less than keen about improving the Grey Quarter.
Doesn't. Matter.
Should the conservative mayor of a city refuse to provide proper support to one of his districts because there are many socialists living in that area ?
How exactly is Tamriel not been torn apart? Hammerfell was just given to the Dominion. I wonder how many Redguards died there? Then of course there's Skyrim which has literally been torn in two, with countless deaths on each side. This is also a direct result of the WGC.
First, Skyrim, Cyrodiil, Morrowind and High Rock are still not part of The Dominion, and that is a direct consequence of the signing of the WGC, the same amount of redguards would've died on Hammerfell if The Empire continued a war that NO ONE was ready to continue.
Second, The Civil War is a direct action of both The Markarth Incident, as well as Ulfric murdering the High King of Skyrim and putting the land into massive unrest.
Okay, maybe the Stormcloaks don't have much of a chance against the entire Dominion, but the Empire definitely doesn't. If they couldn't defend themselves against them back in 171 when they had Hammerfell on their side, how are they going to win now they don't have the Redguards on side and with half of Skyrim not exactly willing to help either?
They would have the support of High Rock, Cyrodiil and perhaps even Morrowind, troop mobilization (sp) would remain unhindered, as would supplies and trade which Skyrim already needs in times where war isn't raging the land.
Aside from having almost three provinces more on their side, the banner of The Empire wouldn't be discriminative, as The Stormcloaks' inherently is, if you are an albino argonian, then you are not out of place in The Legion, but you deffinitely would be among The Stormcloaks, because inherently, their nationalistic ideology separates them from the other races.
At least the Stormcloaks aren't giving away any intelligence to the Thalmor, unlike the Empire where they seem to be everywhere at every important event, from the peace talks to Ulfric's execution.
How the hell is that giving away intelligence ? There's no proof that any of that means The Empire shares everything with The Thalmor, it only means that at important times, dignataries are sent to make sure the terms of the WGC are kept intact.
You're calling the White-Gold Concordant a fair trade? Here's what I understand is involved in the "trade". The Blades were disbanded. Hammerfell was given up to the Thalmor. And the religion that is central to the empire and imperial culture was banned. And all the Empire gets out of it is that the Imperial City won't be destroyed for the time being. That's not a peace treaty, that's a surrender.
Who. Gives. A. fluff ?
What part of "it saved lives" do some people just don't get ? No one in Tamriel, NO ONE was ready to continue fighting The Thalmor, The Empire did the right thing, they stopped the war and allowed everyone to take a breath and regain their strength, because as Tamriel was at the time, NO ONE could've faced The Thalmor.
And you know that Hammerfell were able to fight off the Thalmor by themselves. If they were able to do this, then surely the Empire would have an even better chance. Surely after the Stros M'Kai treaty was signed, when the Thalmor were shown to be not as strong as previously thought, would have been a great chance to rip up the concordant and take the fight to the Thalmor again.
First, sure they did, after The Empire fought the main bulk of their army and weakened them entirely, leaving the redguards to fight off the remnants and leftovers, even an army of Jigglypuffs would've taken those aldmery soldiers with ease.
Second, rip-up the concordat ? I'm pretty sure High Rock would've been happy with other people making decisions for them, and even the "impossible to please" nords would be complaining about "The Empire brought us into another war ! Damn them to oblivion !"
See, it's not just about Talos. Ulfric and Galmar have said time and time again, that this empire is not the same one that they fought for. That they were sold out by the Empire when the treaty was signed, and then sold out a second time with the Markarth incident. That the Thalmor are allowed to go around and torture innocent civilians.
First, IT IS just about Talos, it's exactly why, if not for Ulfric's imbecilic demands, there would be no civil war, but no, he just had to taunt the goddamn Thalmor because he's can't hold his inner attention whore in check, everything he does, everyone he kills, he has to let the entire frikkin world know it, otherwise, it just wasn't worth it.
And Galmar ? Don't even get me started on George W. Bush with a bear-pelt on his head, the sheer idea that The Empire "is not the same one they fought for" demonstrates not only the dragon-sized turd these people have on their heads, but also the sheer irrationality of having to fight a massive war against someone, and yet call them "weak", logic ? fluff that plops when your name is Galmar Stone-Fist.
Second, did you even heard Thorald's assumptions as to why they were torturing him ? The Thalmor could give seven anuses about nords worshipping "x" deity, they enforce that part of the treaty because it ensures idiots like Ulfric and Galmar will stand for causes that cause disruption and allow them to trample over the remains of the inner conflict, it's basic divide and conquer.
That the empire seems to be bending over backwards to the Thalmor but fighting with all their might against the Stormcloaks. If they turned that aggression against the Thalmor, then Ulfric and co. would certainly fight at their side, and there'd be a good chance of defeating them.
So The Empire should a start a war out of pure randomness ? They should push their luck instead of making a strong foothold among their regions ? they should openly disrupt the peace their civilians are having and instead send them to hell on Nirn with another war NO ONE wants ?
Surely your last name is Stone-Fist.