Imperials or Stormcloaks, what one?

  • Welcome to Skyrim Forums! Register now to participate using the 'Sign Up' button on the right. You may now register with your Facebook or Steam account!

feliciano182

Well-Known Member
I didn't say that every Khajiit in Tamriel is a Skooma user or dealer. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Oblivion had some Khajiit that had no Skooma upon their person. I'm also not saying I think it's right to do. But I'm saying that it's Skyrim's way of doing it.

You implied that, since all Khajiit in the game carry skooma, then it is reasonable for the jarls to apply discriminating policies, the problem with that argument is that you assume these policies are applied due to concerns about "a skooma problem", of which there's no basis nor proof for it whatsoever; in contrast, we have the proven dislike of nords towards Khajiit citizens in Skyrim, we know that many traditionalist nords are racist towards "the beast races", the logical conclussion would be to assume that Khajiit are not allowed in the cities because nords dislike them, anything else is conjecture and supposition, or in your case, rationalization for both nord and stormcloak actions.

I'm sure if they had modern screening technology like we do now, then they'd be happy to let anyone in after they've been through security checks.

Proof ? None, again, conjecture and supposition.

And if this were the middle ages, you can bet America would have a stricter border policy. Of course modern nations like America didn't exist back then, so why do these modern standards apply to Skyrim?

It would still be racist policy, which you apparently approve.

We're not supposed to judge this game as if racism was the correct, morally decent path, nobody assumes a "medieval mindset" when playing the game, all the content related to racism in the story is MEANT to be judged with modern ethics.

And I haven't got a racist bone in my body.

Your arguments contradict you every single time.

What I think you're doing is applying modern values on medieval people. This policy of not allowing people of a certain race into the city walls wasn't exactly uncommon in the middle ages. Hell, it took until the 1960's until my country allowed non-white people in. Of course,As far as medieval societies go, Skyrim is pretty damn progressive. And as far as I can tell, I never said "It's a great idea to not allow Khajiit in the city", I just said "I can see why they did it, despite it being wrong."

As I said, the game is meant to be looked upon with our current ethics, and under the premise that inmoral behavior trascends time and subjective judgement, nobody at Bethesda is going to ask you to "assume a medieval, backwards mentality", they're going to ask you "Here, as you are, and with what you know, what do you think of "x" situation ? What do you think of "y" treatment ? Do you approve ? Do your dissaprove ?"

Agreed, but historically there's been more racism shown by the Dunmer than the Nords, especially towards the Argonians, who they used as slaves. So I tend to think that the Dunmer have something to do with the Argonians living outside the walls aswell.

It's a petty (as well as pointless) argument to say there's "more or less" racism here or there, racism is racism, when it appears it's wrong, nobody is "worse" for having more time being prejudiced, and it doesn't excuse the mentality and the policies of Windhelm and the stormcloaks.

Yeah, that's true. Except that his city is under constant threat from an Imperial attack and there isn't a single Dunmer who's put the tiniest bit of effort into helping the defence.

First, unfounded, prejudiced, drunken accusations are never meant to be taken seriously.

Second, the dunmer don't have to help the war effort a single bit, and neither do they deserve to be treated like crap nor accused of nonsense by a well-accomodated idiot.

It's definitely not good enough reason to do the crap that he does. But he isn't doing it for a laugh. I know he's hard to listen to, but if you listen to him, he does have his reasons. Poor reasons, but reasons none the less.

That's not how logic works, if your reasons for doing something are poor, then they are completely invalid, we never say "Well that guy doesn't make any goddamn sense, but he sure has his reasons !".

I'm glad you bring this up though. Since the Americans were terribly racist towards the Japanese during WWII, does this mean that the Japanese were actually the right side in the war, and the bad guys were actually the Americans? Because one of the main arguments against the Stormcloaks is that they're racist.

"The Japanese" is an improper term to describe The Empire Of Japan, as is "The Nords" when speaking of The Stormcloaks.

Apart from that, no idea why bring you this up.

And Ambarys may not be a spy but he's clearly an Imperial supporter. If he's allowed to get away with it but no-one can get away with vocally supporting the Stormcloaks without being executed (Roggvir) or hauled away by the Thalmor (Thorald Grey-Mane), then what does that say about the so-called tolerance and fairness of the Empire?

If those situations say anything, it's about Tullius' or Aldis' methods of dictating justice and "sending out messages", they speak of The Cyrodilic Empire as much as George Patton's slapping of a traumatized soldier did of the US army in WWII.

Aside from that, the truth is simple, The Empire is known to be tolerant of all races and all walks of life, policies and discriminative actions against other groups are completely outside of what is known of them.

But there's proof of at least the Cornerclub at least being sympathetic towards the empire. I'd say it's things like this that make Ulfric less than keen about improving the Grey Quarter.

Doesn't. Matter.

Should the conservative mayor of a city refuse to provide proper support to one of his districts because there are many socialists living in that area ?

How exactly is Tamriel not been torn apart? Hammerfell was just given to the Dominion. I wonder how many Redguards died there? Then of course there's Skyrim which has literally been torn in two, with countless deaths on each side. This is also a direct result of the WGC.

First, Skyrim, Cyrodiil, Morrowind and High Rock are still not part of The Dominion, and that is a direct consequence of the signing of the WGC, the same amount of redguards would've died on Hammerfell if The Empire continued a war that NO ONE was ready to continue.

Second, The Civil War is a direct action of both The Markarth Incident, as well as Ulfric murdering the High King of Skyrim and putting the land into massive unrest.

Okay, maybe the Stormcloaks don't have much of a chance against the entire Dominion, but the Empire definitely doesn't. If they couldn't defend themselves against them back in 171 when they had Hammerfell on their side, how are they going to win now they don't have the Redguards on side and with half of Skyrim not exactly willing to help either?

They would have the support of High Rock, Cyrodiil and perhaps even Morrowind, troop mobilization (sp) would remain unhindered, as would supplies and trade which Skyrim already needs in times where war isn't raging the land.

Aside from having almost three provinces more on their side, the banner of The Empire wouldn't be discriminative, as The Stormcloaks' inherently is, if you are an albino argonian, then you are not out of place in The Legion, but you deffinitely would be among The Stormcloaks, because inherently, their nationalistic ideology separates them from the other races.

At least the Stormcloaks aren't giving away any intelligence to the Thalmor, unlike the Empire where they seem to be everywhere at every important event, from the peace talks to Ulfric's execution.

How the hell is that giving away intelligence ? There's no proof that any of that means The Empire shares everything with The Thalmor, it only means that at important times, dignataries are sent to make sure the terms of the WGC are kept intact.

You're calling the White-Gold Concordant a fair trade? Here's what I understand is involved in the "trade". The Blades were disbanded. Hammerfell was given up to the Thalmor. And the religion that is central to the empire and imperial culture was banned. And all the Empire gets out of it is that the Imperial City won't be destroyed for the time being. That's not a peace treaty, that's a surrender.

Who. Gives. A. fluff ?

What part of "it saved lives" do some people just don't get ? No one in Tamriel, NO ONE was ready to continue fighting The Thalmor, The Empire did the right thing, they stopped the war and allowed everyone to take a breath and regain their strength, because as Tamriel was at the time, NO ONE could've faced The Thalmor.

And you know that Hammerfell were able to fight off the Thalmor by themselves. If they were able to do this, then surely the Empire would have an even better chance. Surely after the Stros M'Kai treaty was signed, when the Thalmor were shown to be not as strong as previously thought, would have been a great chance to rip up the concordant and take the fight to the Thalmor again.

First, sure they did, after The Empire fought the main bulk of their army and weakened them entirely, leaving the redguards to fight off the remnants and leftovers, even an army of Jigglypuffs would've taken those aldmery soldiers with ease.

Second, rip-up the concordat ? I'm pretty sure High Rock would've been happy with other people making decisions for them, and even the "impossible to please" nords would be complaining about "The Empire brought us into another war ! Damn them to oblivion !"

See, it's not just about Talos. Ulfric and Galmar have said time and time again, that this empire is not the same one that they fought for. That they were sold out by the Empire when the treaty was signed, and then sold out a second time with the Markarth incident. That the Thalmor are allowed to go around and torture innocent civilians.

First, IT IS just about Talos, it's exactly why, if not for Ulfric's imbecilic demands, there would be no civil war, but no, he just had to taunt the goddamn Thalmor because he's can't hold his inner attention whore in check, everything he does, everyone he kills, he has to let the entire frikkin world know it, otherwise, it just wasn't worth it.

And Galmar ? Don't even get me started on George W. Bush with a bear-pelt on his head, the sheer idea that The Empire "is not the same one they fought for" demonstrates not only the dragon-sized turd these people have on their heads, but also the sheer irrationality of having to fight a massive war against someone, and yet call them "weak", logic ? fluff that plops when your name is Galmar Stone-Fist.

Second, did you even heard Thorald's assumptions as to why they were torturing him ? The Thalmor could give seven anuses about nords worshipping "x" deity, they enforce that part of the treaty because it ensures idiots like Ulfric and Galmar will stand for causes that cause disruption and allow them to trample over the remains of the inner conflict, it's basic divide and conquer.

That the empire seems to be bending over backwards to the Thalmor but fighting with all their might against the Stormcloaks. If they turned that aggression against the Thalmor, then Ulfric and co. would certainly fight at their side, and there'd be a good chance of defeating them.

So The Empire should a start a war out of pure randomness ? They should push their luck instead of making a strong foothold among their regions ? they should openly disrupt the peace their civilians are having and instead send them to hell on Nirn with another war NO ONE wants ?

Surely your last name is Stone-Fist.
 

Seanu Reaves

The Shogun of Gaming
Sigh take it easy everyone can agree the Thalmor are the only rightfull choice of who deserves to rule. (just made a high elf character kinda lightly roleplaying as Thalomor Justicar...)
 

theoperation

Hero of Jorvasskr
And? Him starting the Stormcloak cause doesn't equate to the Civil War beginning. As I've said, the Civil War didn't begin until the Empire was brought into Skyrim. Why were they brought into Skyrim? To deal with the rebellion and it's leader. The leader that killed the High King.

GeneralTullius.png

The legion's always been in Skyrim
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
For all I know, Molag Bal or some other Evil Daedric Prince could try to take over Nirn and the Civil War would still go on. That is how dumb everyone is being.

Dragon attacks, and you would think the war would be put on hold as soon as both sides saw that thing killing EVERYONE. But noooo, The Empire thinks the dragon is with the rebels, Rebels think the dragon is with the empire, just makes both sides look dumb.
 

theoperation

Hero of Jorvasskr
You implied that, since all Khajiit in the game carry skooma, then it is reasonable for the jarls to apply discriminating policies, the problem with that argument is that you assume these policies are applied due to concerns about "a skooma problem", of which there's no basis nor proof for it whatsoever; in contrast, we have the proven dislike of nords towards Khajiit citizens in Skyrim, we know that many traditionalist nords are racist towards "the beast races", the logical conclussion would be to assume that Khajiit are not allowed in the cities because nords dislike them, anything else is conjecture and supposition, or in your case, rationalization for both nord and stormcloak actions.



Proof ? None, again, conjecture and supposition.

It would still be racist policy, which you apparently approve.

Ysolda when asked why the Khajiit aren't trusted. said:
Reputation, mostly. A lot of Khajiit turn to smuggling and thievery to get by. A few bad apples spoil the bunch. You know how it is.

So it's the reputation that Khajiit have earned by resorting to crime in order to get by. This notion hasn't come out of thin air, which is what you seem to imply. And I never said I approve, just that I get it.


We're not supposed to judge this game as if racism was the correct, morally decent path, nobody assumes a "medieval mindset" when playing the game, all the content related to racism in the story is MEANT to be judged with modern ethics.

So does that mean I can judge the Empire's lack of democratic rule, lack of freedom of speech and religion, the methods used to torture prisoners, the lack of a fair trial for Ulfric and his Stormcloaks, the cruel methods in which Lokir is murdered for stealing a horse, the lack of a fair trial for the dragonborn! If it was judged by today's standards they'd be in the same group as Iran and North Korea.

But hey, at least they're PC. :rolleyes:


Your arguments contradict you every single time.

You can accuse me of being "Elder Scrolls racist", but I'm not racist at all IRL. Quite the opposite in fact.

As I said, the game is meant to be looked upon with our current ethics, and under the premise that inmoral behavior trascends time and subjective judgement, nobody at Bethesda is going to ask you to "assume a medieval, backwards mentality", they're going to ask you "Here, as you are, and with what you know, what do you think of "x" situation ? What do you think of "y" treatment ? Do you approve ? Do your dissaprove ?"

It's definitely a fair comment to look at it from a modern perspective. And for reasons I put up there, I'm very much against the Empire and its methods.

It's a petty (as well as pointless) argument to say there's "more or less" racism here or there, racism is racism, when it appears it's wrong, nobody is "worse" for having more time being prejudiced, and it doesn't excuse the mentality and the policies of Windhelm and the stormcloaks.

There are degrees of racism. It's unfair to lump someone who's a bit insensitive towards people of other races in the same category as Nazi Germany. The same applies here. The noble houses of Morrowind commited far worse atrocities than the government of Windhelm. I hope you were more outraged by them than you are by the Nords of Windhelm.

First, unfounded, prejudiced, drunken accusations are never meant to be taken seriously.

Second, the dunmer don't have to help the war effort a single bit, and neither do they deserve to be treated like crap nor accused of nonsense by a well-accomodated idiot.

That's not how logic works, if your reasons for doing something are poor, then they are completely invalid, we never say "Well that guy doesn't make any goddamn sense, but he sure has his reasons !".

First, if he's not to be taken seriously then neither is Ambarys. They can both jump off a cliff for all I care though.

Second, if they wanted to be respected by the people of Windhelm, then they have to help the war effort. As Belyn Hlaalu said, The best way for them to win the Nords' respect is through hard work. Complaining can only get you so far.

And by reasons I more meant motivations. There's more to it than "oh he's just bat-plops crazy"

"The Japanese" is an improper term to describe The Empire Of Japan, as is "The Nords" when speaking of The Stormcloaks.

Apart from that, no idea why bring you this up.

I'll try to explain.

One of the main criticisms against the Stormcloaks is that they are racist, and that is why one should side with the Empire.

The Americans during WWII were also racist. Therefore one should side against the Americans in WWII.

Of course, I don't think the Americans were the bad guys during WWII. They did commit some terrible acts but compared to the Japanese (sorry, Empire of Japan) they were the lesser of two evils.

If those situations say anything, it's about Tullius' or Aldis' methods of dictating justice and "sending out messages", they speak of The Cyrodilic Empire as much as George Patton's slapping of a traumatized soldier did of the US army in WWII.

Aside from that, the truth is simple, The Empire is known to be tolerant of all races and all walks of life, policies and discriminative actions against other groups are completely outside of what is known of them.

General Tullius is the Empire's representative in Skyrim. If the Emperor thinks his methods are too harsh then he should withdraw him. These methods do speak of the Cyrodilic Empire as much as anything.

Doesn't. Matter.

Should the conservative mayor of a city refuse to provide proper support to one of his districts because there are many socialists living in that area ?

Well it's always been the socialists that treat people of different ideologies worse than conservatives (Soviet Russia, Cuba, etc). Again I'm only saying why I think Ulfric's done it. Not saying I agree with it.

First, Skyrim, Cyrodiil, Morrowind and High Rock are still not part of The Dominion, and that is a direct consequence of the signing of the WGC, the same amount of redguards would've died on Hammerfell if The Empire continued a war that NO ONE was ready to continue.

I don't believe the same amount of Redguards would've died. There's two scenario's here:
  1. The WGC was signed and the Thalmor unsuccessfully attacked Hammerfell, with heavy Redguard losses.
  2. The WGC was not signed and the Thalmor would try to attack both Cyrodiil and Hammerfell, and with Cyrodiil, High Rock and Skyrim on their side, the defence would have been much more successful.
So if you're a Redguard you have a lot of reason to be anti-empire. Maybe this is where part of my anti-empireness comes from, as I'm quite fond of the Redguards. Maybe not every Redguard would be pro-Stormcloak but they are one of the biggest resistances against the Empire. Well, them and the Thalmor.
Second, The Civil War is a direct action of both The Markarth Incident, as well as Ulfric murdering the High King of Skyrim and putting the land into massive unrest.

I know, right!

They would have the support of High Rock, Cyrodiil and perhaps even Morrowind, troop mobilization (sp) would remain unhindered, as would supplies and trade which Skyrim already needs in times where war isn't raging the land.

Aside from having almost three provinces more on their side, the banner of The Empire wouldn't be discriminative, as The Stormcloaks' inherently is, if you are an albino argonian, then you are not out of place in The Legion, but you definitely would be among The Stormcloaks, because inherently, their nationalistic ideology separates them from the other races.

You've been quite evidence-based up until now. But there is no proof that the Stormcloaks (not Windhelm, the Stormcloaks) would be worse for any other race than the Empire. Show me the evidence and then I might believe it.

How the hell is that giving away intelligence ? There's no proof that any of that means The Empire shares everything with The Thalmor, it only means that at important times, dignataries are sent to make sure the terms of the WGC are kept intact.

Such a cosy relationship during a cold war will lead to intelligence being given away. Not that it really matters, as the Empire have already lost and are more or less a puppet government.

Who. Gives. A. fu** ?
What part of "it saved lives" do some people just don't get ? No one in Tamriel, NO ONE was ready to continue fighting The Thalmor, The Empire did the right thing, they stopped the war and allowed everyone to take a breath and regain their strength, because as Tamriel was at the time, NO ONE could've faced The Thalmor.



First, sure they did, after The Empire fought the main bulk of their army and weakened them entirely, leaving the redguards to fight off the remnants and leftovers, even an army of Jigglypuffs would've taken those aldmery soldiers with ease.

Second, rip-up the concordat ? I'm pretty sure High Rock would've been happy with other people making decisions for them, and even the "impossible to please" nords would be complaining about "The Empire brought us into another war ! Damn them to oblivion !"

Churchill would've saved lives if he entered peace talks with Hitler during the Battle of Britain. Hitler didn't want to wipe Britain off the map like he did with Russia, so he was open to negotiation. I'm sure if Churchill had've allowed the Nazis to round up British Jews and give away some of what was left of the British Empire, then there would be peace and many British lives would be saved.

The French surrendered. Many French lives were spared (except Jewish, Black, Arabic, Homosexuals, and anyone who spoke out against the Nazis).

Now looking back, not many people praise the French for their eagerness to surrender. But the British are praised for standing up to the Nazis.

When it comes to these aggressive bully nations like the Thalmor, you must always fight back even if the odds seem stacked against you. That's something the Empire was doing until the WGC.

First, IT IS just about Talos, it's exactly why, if not for Ulfric's imbecilic demands, there would be no civil war, but no, he just had to taunt the goddamn Thalmor because he's can't hold his inner attention whore in check, everything he does, everyone he kills, he has to let the entire frikkin world know it, otherwise, it just wasn't worth it.

And Galmar ? Don't even get me started on George W. Bush with a bear-pelt on his head, the sheer idea that The Empire "is not the same one they fought for" demonstrates not only the dragon-sized turd these people have on their heads, but also the sheer irrationality of having to fight a massive war against someone, and yet call them "weak", logic ? fu** that pl*** when your name is Galmar Stone-Fist.

Second, did you even heard Thorald's assumptions as to why they were torturing him ? The Thalmor could give seven anuses about nords worshipping "x" deity, they enforce that part of the treaty because it ensures idiots like Ulfric and Galmar will stand for causes that cause disruption and allow them to trample over the remains of the inner conflict, it's basic divide and conquer.

If it were only Ulfric that felt this war about what the Empire has become, then there wouldn't be a war. But it's at least half of Skyrim that feel this way.

And the Thalmor are very interested in who worships what God. When it comes to the Altmer, religion is very important to them. They believe they are the decendents of the Aedra. So it is a pretty big affront to the more extreme ones when Talos, a man, is worshipped as a divine god. They can't stand the thought of a mere human becoming divine, because the humans are little more than beasts to the Thalmor. Sure there's also the method of divide and conquer, which the empire was happy to accept.

So The Empire should a start a war out of pure randomness ? They should push their luck instead of making a strong foothold among their regions ? they should openly disrupt the peace their civilians are having and instead send them to hell on Nirn with another war NO ONE wants ?

Surely your last name is Stone-Fist.

How exactly would starting a war with the Thalmor be random? Should they wait for the Thalmor to strike first? Because I think this time the Thalmor aren't going to screw it up. When they strike, they will win. So the best chance is to get in before they do.

I guess I get their strategy of securing Skyrim before attacking the Thalmor, but it would only work if the Stormcloaks could be quickly put down. Of course the only real chance of that happening would be if Mr/Miss Dovahkiin joins the Empire. Otherwise, since there is quite a big support base for the Stormcloaks, it will be a long, drawn out war.

And who said no one wants another war with the Thalmor? If it meant they'll be gone for good, then I'm sure most of Tamriel would be in favour of that.
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
So, um, lets talk about Roggvir again (Solitude gate guard that gets killed when you enter Solitude the first time) and the fact that he was just a gate guard whose job it was to open the gate. It's likely he did not know that Ulfric actually killed Torygg. Not like you can hear a shout from where he was, unless he shouted the roof off the castle.
 

Docta Corvina

Well-Known Member
Just throwing this out there...when Tullius says the Legion's always been in Skyrim, I'd wager he means in a more peaceful capacity - much like how the US has bases in other "friendly" countries around the world. The Legion has had a presence in Skyrim because it has long enlisted Nord soldiers (and others) from there. It has not had anything necessarily to do with being there to keep a vigilant, militaristic eye on the people.

The latter is what the Thalmor is doing there with their so-called Embassy. Bit of a joke really, to call it that. To call it something so innocuous when they've got a torture chamber on site. Damned Thalmor.
 

azali100

Active Member
So, um, lets talk about Roggvir again (Solitude gate guard that gets killed when you enter Solitude the first time) and the fact that he was just a gate guard whose job it was to open the gate. It's likely he did not know that Ulfric actually killed Torygg. Not like you can hear a shout from where he was, unless he shouted the roof off the castle.

Obviously he knew since he literally says "Ulfric Stormcloak is the true High King"
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
But, not a full blown army nor the Thalmor. If you want someone to blame for bringing the Thalmor into Skyrim, that would be your good buddy, Ulfric.

And I suppose that the Empire had nothing to do with the Thalmor being in Skyrim, right? And how they're protected against the Stormcloaks through Imperial protection.

I've spoken to every none hostile Thalmor in Skyrim, and not one said anything about Ulfric is the reason for them being there.

ScreenShot2094.jpg

TESV2012-09-2821-21-43-77.jpg


The facts don't lie :)
 

Jersey Dagmar

Just in time for the fiyahworks show! BOOM!
And yet, the Dominion would rather the Empire lose the Civil War. Whether Ulfric knows it or not, he's a pawn in their game. The Thalmor are more threatened by the prospect of the Empire than the Stormcloaks.

And? Your screenshots mean what exactly? The Thalmor are clearly there because they felt the Empire wasn't upholding the laws, the big one being the banning of Talos worship. (And guess what the Empire wasn't upholding that law, case in point Whiterun)

The killing of the High King put Skyrim in the spotlight for the Dominion. The Thalmor are doing a classic, but effective divide and conquer tactic. So, yep, your homeboy is falling right into their hands. I almost wish that Bethesda makes the Stormcloaks winning the Civil War and then Ulfric thoroughly gets his ass handed to him by the Dominion.
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
Before:
But, not a full blown army nor the Thalmor. If you want someone to blame for bringing the Thalmor into Skyrim, that would be your good buddy, Ulfric.

After:
And? Your screenshots mean what exactly? The Thalmor are clearly there because they felt the Empire wasn't upholding the laws, the big one being the banning of Talos worship. (And guess what the Empire wasn't upholding that law, case in point Whiterun)

Thank you for correcting your mistakes. My screenshots indicates facts, not opinions. What you said about Ulfric being at fault for the Thalmor presence is base on your opinion while on the other hand the Thalmor that I spoken with in the game says otherwise.

FACT: The Thalmor are in Skyrim because of the Empire, not Ulfric.
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
Obviously he knew since he literally says "Ulfric Stormcloak is the true High King"

Did he know Before or after Ulfric fled Solitude? At the time, he might not have known, and thus it would not be his fault Ulfric got away.
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
And yet, the Dominion would rather the Empire lose the Civil War. Whether Ulfric knows it or not, he's a pawn in their game. The Thalmor are more threatened by the prospect of the Empire than the Stormcloaks.

And? Your screenshots mean what exactly? The Thalmor are clearly there because they felt the Empire wasn't upholding the laws, the big one being the banning of Talos worship. (And guess what the Empire wasn't upholding that law, case in point Whiterun)

The killing of the High King put Skyrim in the spotlight for the Dominion. The Thalmor are doing a classic, but effective divide and conquer tactic. So, yep, your homeboy is falling right into their hands. I almost wish that Bethesda makes the Stormcloaks winning the Civil War and then Ulfric thoroughly gets his ass handed to him by the Dominion.

You do know that the Thalmor do not want the war to end, period. If you read the Thalmor Dossier on Ulfric, then you would know that either side winning would be bad for the Dominion's position in Skyrim.

The killing of the high king was just a message to the other Jarls, and gained Ulfric more support. I doubt It has anything to due with the Thalmor.
 

Docta Corvina

Well-Known Member
From the dossier on Ulfric:

Operational Notes: Direct contact remains a possibility (under extreme circumstances), but in general the asset should be considered dormant. As long as the civil war proceeds in its current indecisive fashion, we should remain hands-off. The incident at Helgen is an example where an exception had to be made - obviously Ulfric's death would have dramatically increased the chance of an Imperial victory and thus harmed our overall position in Skyrim. (NOTE: The coincidental intervention of the dragon at Helgen is still under scrutiny. The obvious conclusion is that whoever is behind the dragons also has an interest in the continuation of the war, but we should not assume therefore that their goals align with our own.) A Stormcloak victory is also to be avoided, however, so even indirect aid to the Stormcloaks must be carefully managed.

They make a point to say that indeed an Imperial victory would directly harm their position in Skyrim, which makes obvious and perfect sense. And yes, they also say that Stormcloak victory is not something to be favored, yet they are desirous to provide indirect aid.

What they want is to drag the thing out as long as possible. It's a proxy war and when it all boils down, the Empire coming out on the "winning" side would be lastingly bad for Thalmor business. Earlier in the document, they reference the Markarth Incident as being ultimately an event in their favor, when it comes to Ulfric's shifted allegiances. It's all a huge, ugly, bloody chess game.
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
From the dossier on Ulfric:



They make a point to say that indeed an Imperial victory would directly harm their position in Skyrim, which makes obvious and perfect sense. And yes, they also say that Stormcloak victory is not something to be favored, yet they are desirous to provide indirect aid.

What they want is to drag the thing out as long as possible. It's a proxy war and when it all boils down, the Empire coming out on the "winning" side would be lastingly bad for Thalmor business. Earlier in the document, they reference the Markarth Incident as being ultimately an event in their favor, when it comes to Ulfric's shifted allegiances. It's all a huge, ugly, bloody chess game.

Once again, I must reiterate that the dragon showing up proves that both sides are dumb. They continue the war when they should be focusing on getting rid of the dragon, and it takes the player for them to realize it, when they should have realized it themsleves.
 

feliciano182

Well-Known Member
So it's the reputation that Khajiit have earned by resorting to crime in order to get by. This notion hasn't come out of thin air, which is what you seem to imply. And I never said I approve, just that I get it.

I never said it came out of nowhere, I said it came from the mentality of backwards nords with positions of power in Skyrim, of which the vast majority supports The Stormcloaks.

So does that mean I can judge the Empire's lack of democratic rule, lack of freedom of speech and religion, the methods used to torture prisoners, the lack of a fair trial for Ulfric and his Stormcloaks, the cruel methods in which Lokir is murdered for stealing a horse, the lack of a fair trial for the dragonborn! If it was judged by today's standards they'd be in the same group as Iran and North Korea.

But hey, at least they're PC. :rolleyes:

Actually, you could, that's exactly why you see torture devices, Roggvir's execution, Tullius' lack of empathy towards Nords, etc. You are meant to judge those accordingly with what you believe, you are not meant to do a somersault and say "I get it.........but I don't approve...........yet I actually do".

And while everything that you've mentioned applies equally to The Stormcloaks, I never said The Empire had their hands clean, there's a lot of stuff that bothers me that's been done "For The Emperor", but nothing is perfect, and in a situation where a choice has to be made, The Empire is simply the rational one.

Also, just for "skull-bashing" sake, lack of democratic rule ? As far as I know, The Empire allows every province to rule itself as long as they pay their taxes and have their soldiers serve in The Legion. Before the WGC, censorship was never institutionalized. Lokir getting killed the way he did ? A sad, unfortunate event that can be properly acquited to a ruthless, inmoral captain, Tullius actually wanted Ulfric to receive a trial in Cyrodiil, but he received "orders" from the brass.

There are degrees of racism. It's unfair to lump someone who's a bit insensitive towards people of other races in the same category as Nazi Germany. The same applies here. The noble houses of Morrowind commited far worse atrocities than the government of Windhelm. I hope you were more outraged by them than you are by the Nords of Windhelm.

Pointless, your argument is.

Regardless of what happened or didn't happen in Morrowind, none of which I approve, it doesn't excuse the policies and beliefs of The Stormcloaks, they are an army composed of ultra-right wing nutjobs that care not for the needs of anyone but themselves, consequently dooming all of Tamriel to a universally despised enemy.

Second, if they wanted to be respected by the people of Windhelm, then they have to help the war effort.

No they don't, cut it out with this point, you're constantly hitting the same wall trying to bring moral foundation to The Stormcloak cause with this nonsensical "blackmail logic", you're failing. Nobody should have to support any cause they don't agree with, the matter here is simple:

The dunmer are the inhabitants of the city of Windhelm, the latter is ruled by Jarl Ulfric Stormcloak, what is a Jarl's duty to the inhabitants of city ? To provide support and proper care for them, period.

As Belyn Hlaalu said, The best way for them to win the Nords' respect is through hard work. Complaining can only get you so far.

Good for Belyn, even if his opinion doesn't erase the fact that being a dunmer or an argonian, and living in The Grey Quarter or The Docks is pretty damn horrible, it doesn't erase the fact that their oportunities are being limited by a proverbial glass ceiling, it doesn't erase the fact that the racism in Windhelm is institutional, it's not just the common folk who hate them, it's the goddamn government.

And by reasons I more meant motivations. There's more to it than "oh he's just bat-pl*** crazy"

Nope, he's just an drunken, ignorant idiot.

I'll try to explain. One of the main criticisms against the Stormcloaks is that they are racist, and that is why one should side with the Empire. The Americans during WWII were also racist. Therefore one should side against the Americans in WWII. Of course, I don't think the Americans were the bad guys during WWII. They did commit some terrible acts but compared to the Japanese (sorry, Empire of Japan) they were the lesser of two evils.

Racism in the US military, in WWII, was not institutionalized, the military didn't actively fight a war with xenophobic grounding for their motivations, your analogy is completely flawed.

General Tullius is the Empire's representative in Skyrim. If the Emperor thinks his methods are too harsh then he should withdraw him. These methods do speak of the Cyrodilic Empire as much as anything.

And many of those I don't agree with, however, the majority I do, The Empire offers protection, unity, support and rights to all races of Tamriel, as well as a single banner for all of them to fight together against a sure fight against a future enemy. However, if you are a nord, that only cares about are the nords of Skyrim, then sure, The Stormcloaks are your best bet.

Again I'm only saying why I think Ulfric's done it. Not saying I agree with it.

Yeah sure, you understand everything, yet you support nothing when the conversation isn't favoring you, nice.

The WGC was not signed and the Thalmor would try to attack both Cyrodiil and Hammerfell, and with Cyrodiil, High Rock and Skyrim on their side, the defence would have been much more successful.

Hindsight is always 20/20.

At the time, and after retaking The Imperial City, The Legion was in no condition to fight, what were they going to do ? Lend support they couldn't afford to give ? What if The Thalmor attacked Cyrodiil again from Elsweyr ? Or even Black Marsh ? Were they going to leave the capital completely defenseless ?

I think it's pretty reasonable to say that signing the WGC was a good solution, considering no one could've expected Hammerfell to be able to defeat a weakened Dominion army.

But there is no proof that the Stormcloaks (not Windhelm, the Stormcloaks) would be worse for any other race than the Empire. Show me the evidence and then I might believe it.

.............................................

Are you serious ?

What the hell have we been talking about when we were discussing the racism in Windhelm ? What in the name of Mara have we been saying all this time about the treatment of dunmers and argonians in the Grey Quarter and The Docks ? What the fluff have we been mentioning about how the overall mentality of the stormcloaks is made up by conservative, traditionalist, right wing nord ideology ?

Don't joke with that stuff man.

*Another "historical" flawed analogy*

The difference here, is that The British Empire was committed to fighting the war, and they were in proper shape to actually fight it. The Cyrodilic Empire was ambushed from the southern border, forced to find refuge in a province and make an assault with whatever troops they were able to gather, after that, nothing was certain, no victory was guaranteed, and the future looked to be incredibly grim and long, the only choice was to take advantage of peace, not only to prevent more violence, but to be better prepared for the next time.

When it comes to these aggressive bully nations like the Thalmor, you must always fight back even if the odds seem stacked against you. That's something the Empire was doing until the WGC.

You must always fight back when you have a chance of winning or you are left no choice, otherwise, you're an idiot.

If it were only Ulfric that felt this war about what the Empire has become, then there wouldn't be a war. But it's at least half of Skyrim that feel this way.

That's not the only reason to join The Stormcloaks, and it certainly doesn't mean that a bad choice can't be made by thousands.

Sure there's also the method of divide and conquer, which the empire was happy to accept.

Mental gymnastics, they are being performed here.

Surely it was a simple mistake that the Thalmor redacted a document that stated Ulfric Stormcloak as an asset due to his involvement in The Markarth Incident.

How exactly would starting a war with the Thalmor be random? Should they wait for the Thalmor to strike first? Because I think this time the Thalmor aren't going to screw it up. When they strike, they will win. So the best chance is to get in before they do.

Oh ! But wouldn't the mighty sons and daughters of Skyrim be able to hold off entire hordes of altmer ? Why should they worry if they strike first ?

Regardless of who attacks first, The Empire cannot push for another war in times of peace, not only because of the moral considerations about who fluffed up it would be to sign a peace treaty and then tear it apart to start another war, that would make them the instigators, and it puts them and their citizens at an inmense risk.
 

Crooksin

Glue Sniffer
Once again, I must reiterate that the dragon showing up proves that both sides are dumb. They continue the war when they should be focusing on getting rid of the dragon, and it takes the player for them to realize it, when they should have realized it themsleves.

I didn't realize this was the "How dumb are both sides when a dragon is going to destroy Skyrim."
This thread isn't about that, it's specifically about the morals and justification of ONLY the Empire and Stormcloaks with all other factors aside, your attempts to bring that up are fruitless. That being said, the Stormcloaks had started the war in the first place, so if a world-destroying dragon was high on their priority list, they wouldn't have started the war.
 

Recent chat visitors

Latest posts

Top