Imperials or Stormcloaks, what one?

  • Welcome to Skyrim Forums! Register now to participate using the 'Sign Up' button on the right. You may now register with your Facebook or Steam account!

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
You think Ulfric gave the people of Markarth a "Fair trial" before executing them for not fighting with him to force the Empire to agree to Ulfric's terms before allowing them entry.

Not the Markarth incident again... Really? Ulfric was hired to retake the reach back. How is that his fault? The only thing that hes guilty of doing is being a prostitute; a filthy whore at best. Instead of gold he accepted the freedom to worship Talos with an exchange for his service.

Go wave the blame finger at the person who hired Ulfric.
 

DrunkenMage

Intoxicated Arch-Mage
Though onto the trial thing. Ulfric killed the High King, he admits that. That means he is guilty of High Treason against the Empire which the only punishment is death. General Tullius being the Military Governor of Skyrim and an Officer of the Empire allows him to sentence Ulfric Stormcloak.

The man who hired Ulfric Stormcloak didn't say slaughter everyone.
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
Ulfric admits to killing the High King, Not flat out murdering him.Theirs a difference between killing and murdering. He said that their were plenty of witnesses that saw what happen. The High King accepted his duel and therefor murder becomes irreverent. It was a verbal contract.

Can you show me lore indicating exactly what happen during the exchange between Ulfric and the Jarl? I never recall anything like that.
 

Mr.Self Destruct

Chosen Undead
The fact is the Empire refused to give Ulfric a fair trial... to allow himself to prove himself to be innocent. It shows just how brutal the Empire truly is... and how they should no longer have control over Skyrim.

Weren't you claiming we should put death row prisoners in ovens to execute them? Now you're concerned that Ulfric, who clearly committed treason, didn't deserve to get his head cut off?

What kind of mental gymnastics are going on here?
 

DrunkenMage

Intoxicated Arch-Mage
Ulfric admits to killing the High King, Not flat out murdering him.Theirs a difference between killing and murdering. He said that their were plenty of witnesses that saw what happen. The High King accepted his duel and therefor murder becomes irreverent. It was a verbal contract.

Can you show me lore indicating exactly what happen during the exchange between Ulfric and the Jarl? I never recall anything like that.

By Imperial law he is guilty. Ulfric Stormcloak didn't flee Solitude like a bat out of hell, knowing he was innocent. He was trying to get the Empire's attention. He was running from Nords, the Imperial Legion wasn't even involved until Ulfric declared war against the western holds.
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
Weren't you claiming we should put death row prisoners in ovens to execute them? Now you're concerned that Ulfric, who clearly committed treason, didn't deserve to get his head cut off?

What kind of mental gymnastics are going on here?

What does RL politics has to do with fictional politics? Ulfric Stormcloak isn't real :) On the other hand murderers who actually murder real life people should be executed after being convicted by the jury of court. In ovens you say? When did I ever say that?
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
By Imperial law he is guilty. Ulfric Stormcloak didn't flee Solitude like a bat out of hell, knowing he was innocent. He was trying to get the Empire's attention. He was running from Nords, the Imperial Legion wasn't even involved until Ulfric declared war against the western holds.

Ulfric fled the scene because most likely he was chased by angry guards and by ignorant citizens.
 

DrunkenMage

Intoxicated Arch-Mage
By Imperial law he is guilty. Ulfric Stormcloak didn't flee Solitude like a bat out of hell, knowing he was innocent. He was trying to get the Empire's attention. He was running from Nords, the Imperial Legion wasn't even involved until Ulfric declared war against the western holds.

Ulfric fled the scene because most likely he was chased by angry guards and by ignorant citizens.

So just because they don't support Ulfric, they're ignorant. Guess that is why you force tyranny onto the other half of Skyrim.
 

Mr.Self Destruct

Chosen Undead
What does RL politics has to do with fictional politics? Ulfric Stormcloak isn't real :) On the other hand murderers who actually murder real life people should be executed after being convicted by the jury of court. In ovens you say? When did I ever say that?


I believe the term you used was "bring out ol' smokey" or something along those lines. I could be wrong, and if I am my bad.

Exactly, Ulfric doesn't get a "fair" trial because this isn't modern day. Call the Empire what you want, but the punishment for treason is clear, and there's no argument that Ulfric killed Torygg.

Did Ulfric give a fair trial to the men who didn't fight with him during the Markarth Incident?
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
By Imperial law he is guilty. Ulfric Stormcloak didn't flee Solitude like a bat out of hell, knowing he was innocent. He was trying to get the Empire's attention. He was running from Nords, the Imperial Legion wasn't even involved until Ulfric declared war against the western holds.

Ulfric fled the scene because most likely he was chased by angry guards and by ignorant citizens.

So just because they don't support Ulfric, they're ignorant. Guess that is why you force tyranny onto the other half of Skyrim.

Now you're putting words right inside my mouth. I did not say that.

It takes 1 or 2 people to create a riot by spreading lies and false accusations. It's a psychological response. When peoples emotions reach the maximum level they can no longer reason. They cannot think for themselves, and so they start believing what is being told all around. It's like a train.

The witnesses that Ulfric mention were probably too terrified to back Ulfric up fearing that they would be outcast, and be labeled as a traitor.
 

Dagmar

Defender of the Bunnies of Skyrim
I could never truly understand what was the big deal of Ulfric surrendering to the Imperial Legion. What is Ulfric suppose to do as he was surrounded by Imperial soldiers with very few of his own men standing by his side? Suicide by Imperial legion? I find it quite honorable for a man to acknowledge his defeat, and knowing his limitations.
It's inconsistent with him letting his men die at Windhelm and engaging in a duel against Tullius, Rikke and the Dragonborn which he acknowledges is going to end in his death. I just accept it as a plot device since having him die fighting against the Legion in the beginning of the game would make for a very short Stormcloak and Imperial Legion faction quest lines but it doesn't make any sense to respect his actions in the beginning of the game as the honorable choice and then disown that perspective when he does the exact opposite at the end of the game.
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
What does RL politics has to do with fictional politics? Ulfric Stormcloak isn't real :) On the other hand murderers who actually murder real life people should be executed after being convicted by the jury of court. In ovens you say? When did I ever say that?


I believe the term you used was "bring out ol' smokey" or something along those lines. I could be wrong, and if I am my bad.

Exactly, Ulfric doesn't get a "fair" trial because this isn't modern day. Call the Empire what you want, but the punishment for treason is clear, and there's no argument that Ulfric killed Torygg.

Did Ulfric give a fair trial to the men who didn't fight with him during the Markarth Incident?

Ah :) I mention about bringing back ole sparky on that other thread. Here in Florida our government use to execute convicted murderers by using the electric chair as a method for execution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Sparky

"No, they wouldn't dare give Ulfric a fair trial. Treason, for fighting for your own people! All of Skyrim would have seen the truth then." Ralof said

This is exactly why the Empire refused to give Ulfric a fair trial... to prevent people from knowing the truth.

Do you honestly believe that the United States government would give Edward Snowden a fair trial if he was to be brought back to the states? Hell no.
 

Dagmar

Defender of the Bunnies of Skyrim
The fact is the Empire refused to give Ulfric a fair trial... to allow himself to prove himself to be innocent...
There's nothing to prove. He's guilty of high treason. Every version of what happened in Solitude including Ulfric's confirms this. Regardless of the circumstances, he inflicted harm (mortal harm) on the allegiated sovereign of Skyrim.
Ulfric admits to killing the High King, Not flat out murdering him.Theirs a difference between killing and murdering.
It's a difference without a distinction because high treason doesn't require murder as an element of the crime. The only element is harm to an allegiated sovereign. The law doesn't even take intent into account which is extremely harsh but consistent with feudal laws of certain societies of antiquity.
It was a verbal contract.
You can't contract to do something that's illlegal. That's jurisprudence 101. It's a basic tenet for invalidating contracts under common law. It's also simply common sense unless you actually think someone can hire someone to murder them and the murderer can wave the contract at the authorities and the courts as if it were some kind of get out of jail free card.
 

Mr.Self Destruct

Chosen Undead
"No, they wouldn't dare give Ulfric a fair trial. Treason, for fighting for your own people! All of Skyrim would have seen the truth then." Ralof said

This is exactly why the Empire refused to give Ulfric a fair trial... to prevent people from knowing the truth.

Bringing in the opinion of one of Ulfric's most devoted troops is hardly evidence of anything, do you honestly think the Empire could hide the fact that Ulfric was executed? For what reason? And how? How would nobody think to question where there Jarl went? If they were trying to hide it why would they host the executions in the middle of Helghen? Where it's clear there is some sympathy for Stormcloaks?

Do you honestly believe that the United States government would give Edward Snowden a fair trial if he was to be brought back to the states? Hell no.


They certainly wouldn't cut his head off.
 

DrunkenMage

Intoxicated Arch-Mage
What does RL politics has to do with fictional politics? Ulfric Stormcloak isn't real :) On the other hand murderers who actually murder real life people should be executed after being convicted by the jury of court. In ovens you say? When did I ever say that?


I believe the term you used was "bring out ol' smokey" or something along those lines. I could be wrong, and if I am my bad.

Exactly, Ulfric doesn't get a "fair" trial because this isn't modern day. Call the Empire what you want, but the punishment for treason is clear, and there's no argument that Ulfric killed Torygg.

Did Ulfric give a fair trial to the men who didn't fight with him during the Markarth Incident?

Ah :) I mention about bringing back ole sparky on that other thread. Here in Florida our government use to execute convicted murderers by using the electric chair as a method for execution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Sparky

"No, they wouldn't dare give Ulfric a fair trial. Treason, for fighting for your own people! All of Skyrim would have seen the truth then." Ralof said

This is exactly why the Empire refused to give Ulfric a fair trial... to prevent people from knowing the truth.

Do you honestly believe that the United States government would give Edward Snowden a fair trial if he was to be brought back to the states? Hell no.

United States of America is not the Third Empire of Tamriel. The comparison has nothing in common. The Empire resembles closer to that of Rome than USA.
 

Dagmar

Defender of the Bunnies of Skyrim
"No, they wouldn't dare give Ulfric a fair trial. Treason, for fighting for your own people! All of Skyrim would have seen the truth then." Ralof said

This is exactly why the Empire refused to give Ulfric a fair trial... to prevent people from knowing the truth.
The people already know the truth. Ulfric killed Torygg, period. That's as far as one has to go to know that he's guilty of high treason. A trial would have been a mere formality in this situation. Ralof is merely expressing his opinion that what Ulfric did was justified. It does nothing to invalidate the fact that Ulfric is guilty of treason because there are no mitigating defenses to the crime in general and to the killing of Torygg in particular.
 

NENALATA

Last King of the Ayleids - RETIRED
Raijin


Hey guys, I was going to another page and somehow ended up here and... couldn't resist. :)

Regrettably, I must agree with Dagmar on her understanding of the Empire. I've come to the same conclusions on this one thing.

Really hard to have sympathy for Ulfric when he answers a personal challenge from fellow Jarl by sending his army instead of answering himself. And I know the quests works both ways but he sends his army anyways.

Kind of a funny story. When I first started playing Skyrim, I killed Thalmor left and right. Then, Jarl B and his court attacked me whenever I would walk into the castle. So, I ran to Windhelm and thought I was in the right place. Found out later that they were mad because I "murdered the Thalmor". However if the Thalmor attack you first, you're good. And if you're in the Legion, they will assist you against the Thalmor.

Anyways, in Windhelm I heard this line about, "Running a sword thru Jarl B's gullet...". Now... I'll be honest here. I've never really had any special affection for the Empire. Jarl B however is a VERY GOOD MAN who is only interested in saving his people. However, I, even as a Thalmor, could understand Whiterun's position. Because he is not aligned with the Empire until later when Ulfric puts a sword to his throat, he doesn't bother anyone but doesn't want Ulfric forcing his "concept of freedom" on him and his people. Think about it.

If Ulfric really ~ TRULY ~ was a man whose hearts beats for freedom, THEN WHY INVADE MARKARTH? WHY INVADE WHITERUN? (Dossier says during Markarth incident he was cooperative with the Thalmor) He wants the Empire out so bad, he wants Skyrim free of what he calls, "Imperial Oppression", but he had no RESPECT for other independent parties. Gen Tullius at least, hehehe AT LEAST in the VERY LEAST asks PERMISSION to enter Whiterun.

Tell me more about how Ulfric is going to free Skyrim from Oppression.

And another thing dude ~ Based on some of your responses, I don't think you have any place accusing me of lacking "common-sense". ESPECIALLY if you're not willing to acknowledge how Ulfric's machine is tearing Skyrim apart, destroying families and ruining a country that is in good shape because of the Empire... oddly enough.

Another thing, East Empire is run by the Empire, albeit not directly. It's more of a service supporting the Empire. However, Morrowind, which is trying to rebuild, appears to be EXTREMELY dependent on it, among other Provinces. However, the war with Ulfric, problems with pirates (Stormcloak pirates maybe :) ) is driving up prices. IF Skyrim secedes, you can kiss it all good bye. Ulfric won't allow anything Imperial to operate safely in Skyrim's waters because of it's close affiliation with the Empire. No escorts, no base in Skyrim will be welcomed, many will suffer. And there may be some alternatives, however a few of them are thick with the pirates and could extort their customers.

Also, what Dagmar was saying about Ulfric... ties in with my point up above there, WHERE WAS THE OLIVE BRANCH? Hmmm? Where was the respect for the High King's position of authority? High King Torygg was NEVER presented with an OFFICIAL PETITION for the Liberation of Skyrim from the Empire ~ Even though the 'kid' looked up to Ulfric because he was in over his head.

High King Torygg was NEVER given a chance to change his mind, he was never offered any Ultimatum or any type of Formal Discussion about Skyrim's "Liberation" from the Empire. Ulfric Legally ASSASSINATED Torygg to get him out of the way so he might have a chance at the Throne of Skyrim. So instead of trying to help his friend, Ulfric butchered him in front of his wife for his own sick ambition.

Seriously. Even THE DAMN THALMOR gave the Emperor a petition for the WGC and had counsel with him. They showed that much respect, they didn't try and weasel their way out of their official responsibilities. We didn't like our losses in Cyrodil but we manned up and signed the GD treaty, just like the Empire had to do.

Ulfric is web spinner and NO ONE can ever trust him again.

And one last point. I DO NOT give a DAMN about the Empire banning the worship of Talos when you have "people" who claim to worship Talos, to be fighting in HIS NAME who are going around doing pl*ps like this?

You think TALOS would APPROVE of Ulfric accepting or requesting a duel with Jarl B and then sending his fl*ffing army to answer it instead of showing up HIMSELF? Jarl B was in Plate Armor, HEAVY DUTY COMBAT ARMOR man. He was not fl*ffing around and expected to meet Ulfric man to man. You know, in the traditional "Nord Fashion" or some kind of line Ulfric fed Torygg. But instead, the cowardly POS sends his army.

OMG. And this is why I dis-approve of the Thalmor having any dealings with Ulfric, it makes us look like pl*ps. I would wager Ulfric is probably more evil than the Thalmor. If you can imagine what that would be like.

Ulfric is crazy and is a Danger to the free world. Seeing how his is a Charismatic cause, anyone who follows him, is like him. More Dangerous than us really. The Thalmor are upfront about who we are and make no apology for it or try and pretend we're something we're not.

People at least know where they stand with us, even if it's beneath. :)
 

NENALATA

Last King of the Ayleids - RETIRED
fl*ff Ulfric. Yeah you Stormcloaks out there I understand, I know where you're coming from ~ but Ulfric is NOT who he pretends to be.

Another thing, MARTIAL LAW was Declared in Skyrim *BECAUSE of ULFRIC* and Martial Law allows for summary executions, esp that of the REBEL LEADER. The very person who caused this problem to begin with by engineering a means of CIRCUMVENTING the Civilian Gov and throwing said Gov into DEADLOCK resulting in Civil War.

Which is one thing which sparked the American Revolution. Because during Torygg's moot, Ulfric voiced his dissent however, the COLD FRIGHTENING TRUTH is thusly:

AT LEAST ONE STORMCLOAK JARL VOTED FOR TORYGG.

So this means then, that not all the Jarls are with Ulfric and for him to get what he wants he has to do this by FORCE. FORCE the Civilian Gov into accepting as much Freedom as Ulfric thinks they should have but for no other reason than his own intuition.

At least the Empire had a more or less... "Noble" reason for banning Talos. They were not just thinking of themselves.
 

High King of Skyrim

King of the barbarian horde
Don't forget the story of the 300 Spartans, the Persians awoke a sleeping giant

Anything+you+can+do+Spartans+do+better+Spartans+do+anything+_adf37a50983514895d03889958ca2e67.jpg


All joking aside, the story of the 300 was exactly that, a story. The Athenians had already been preparing for a second Persian invasions by Xerxes after his father's previous attempt to conquer Greece. They built a large navy and formed an alliance of the city-states to create an army to defend against Xerxes forces long before the Battle of Thermopylae. The fact of the matter is that, after the battle, the Persian armies went on to invade and occupy most of Greece during the first year of the war. It was the foresight of the Athenians in building the Greek Navy and the incontestable superiority of Greek hoplite warfare strategy on high ground and narrow passes which defeated the second Persian invasion of Greece. While historically inspirational, the Battle of Thermopylae was of minor consequence to the outcome of the war. If that's all that the Stormcloaks can aspire to in terms of contributing to a war against the Aldmeri Dominion that's setting the bar pretty low. At the end of the day a battle that "makes for a great song" doesn't win wars. Preparation and superior strategy does.
Anybody ever tell you you're a killjoy, major killjoy!
 

The Laoch

He is the Prince of Order. Or was it biscuits?
Well i have played both sides of the Civil War many times, and the reason Ulfric sent his army instead of himself is to show Skyrim how powerful the Stormcloaks were.

I don't like Ulfric, but he can use the thu'um and if you ask me it would be very hard to beat Ulfric 1v1. I mean the man can just shout and you go flying.
 

NENALATA

Last King of the Ayleids - RETIRED
Well i have played both sides of the Civil War many times, and the reason Ulfric sent his army instead of himself is to show Skyrim how powerful the Stormcloaks were.


Oh that's nice. So, so in other words, what you're saying is that Torygg should have just sent the Imperial Army to handle Ulfric instead of being man enough to answer the duel proper?


I don't like Ulfric, but he can use the thu'um and if you ask me it would be very hard to beat Ulfric 1v1. I mean the man can just shout and you go flying.


What is right cannot be determined by strength. Of all people, Gen Tullius seems to understand this.

Otherwise...

- He would have just taken Whiterun by FORCE.

- He would have turned Legate Rikke over to the Thalmor for praying to Talos at Ulfric's death, FORCING her to apologize and recant her beliefs

- He would have FORCED the ban on Talos worship in Skyrim rather than having a "soft touch" and looking the other way

- He would have FORCED the Empire on the Jarls rather than give them a say in how their cities are run, as Drunken Mage said, The Thalmor in Markarth are still answerable to the Jarl
 

Recent chat visitors

Latest posts

Top