Daelon DuLac
How do you backstab a Dragon?
What? Did you say something?HOW HAS THIS THREAD HAD 21,000 REPLIES?! HOW ARE WE STILL DEBATING THIS SIX YEARS LATER?!
View attachment 53402
What? Did you say something?HOW HAS THIS THREAD HAD 21,000 REPLIES?! HOW ARE WE STILL DEBATING THIS SIX YEARS LATER?!
View attachment 53402
Racists you say? They seem to be the most welcoming and accepting racists I've ever saw, though I must be confused, is racism allowing those you hate to live in your city, eat your food, sell your wares, own businesses etc?.. I guess if you're a proud, straight, white male then any sort of self preservation movement is deemed racist, even if you do live in the most diverse city in Skyrim.I'd always pick Imperial over Stormcloak.... The Stormcloaks feel a bit too neanderthal to me. I like the medieval feel of the Imperials... Plus they're not a bunch of racists
Racists you say? They seem to be the most welcoming and accepting racists I've ever saw, though I must be confused, is racism allowing those you hate to live in your city, eat your food, sell your wares, own businesses etc?.. I guess if you're a proud, straight, white male then any sort of self preservation movement is deemed racist, even if you do live in the most diverse city in Skyrim.I'd always pick Imperial over Stormcloak.... The Stormcloaks feel a bit too neanderthal to me. I like the medieval feel of the Imperials... Plus they're not a bunch of racists
Oh wait, was allowing Dunmer to build and keep a huge shrine to Azura the racist part? Or was it Ulfric allowing a High Elf to own the most prestigious property in Windhelm? Could it be the part where Nords work UNDER Elves in Windhelm that's racist? No, no.. It must be the part where Ulfric allows Nord war veterans to live on the streets whilst Dunmer refugees live in houses, that damned racist.
Be honest, your generlisation is based on the premise that foreigners should be treated better than natives in their own land, depending on who those natives are.
Racists you say? They seem to be the most welcoming and accepting racists I've ever saw, though I must be confused, is racism allowing those you hate to live in your city, eat your food, sell your wares, own businesses etc?.. I guess if you're a proud, straight, white male then any sort of self preservation movement is deemed racist, even if you do live in the most diverse city in Skyrim.I'd always pick Imperial over Stormcloak.... The Stormcloaks feel a bit too neanderthal to me. I like the medieval feel of the Imperials... Plus they're not a bunch of racists
Oh wait, was allowing Dunmer to build and keep a huge shrine to Azura the racist part? Or was it Ulfric allowing a High Elf to own the most prestigious property in Windhelm? Could it be the part where Nords work UNDER Elves in Windhelm that's racist? No, no.. It must be the part where Ulfric allows Nord war veterans to live on the streets whilst Dunmer refugees live in houses, that damned racist.
Be honest, your generlisation is based on the premise that foreigners should be treated better than natives in their own land, depending on who those natives are.
So, I’ve played through the Civil War on both sides. Personally, I enjoyed fighting for the Stormcloaks for four reasons:
1. The dialog options made me feel more like an equal with the Stormcloaks. Repeating, “Yes, sir!” over and over as an Imperial got old fast.
2. The final battle was more interesting, with me and Ulfric seeing who could shout more foes off their feet.
3. The reward of a unique set of Stormcloak Bear (Officer) armor was more satisfying.
4. The modest collection of helmets from dead Imperials looked great decorating Ulfric’s throne!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm confused.Racists you say? They seem to be the most welcoming and accepting racists I've ever saw, though I must be confused, is racism allowing those you hate to live in your city, eat your food, sell your wares, own businesses etc?.. I guess if you're a proud, straight, white male then any sort of self preservation movement is deemed racist, even if you do live in the most diverse city in Skyrim.I'd always pick Imperial over Stormcloak.... The Stormcloaks feel a bit too neanderthal to me. I like the medieval feel of the Imperials... Plus they're not a bunch of racists
Oh wait, was allowing Dunmer to build and keep a huge shrine to Azura the racist part? Or was it Ulfric allowing a High Elf to own the most prestigious property in Windhelm? Could it be the part where Nords work UNDER Elves in Windhelm that's racist? No, no.. It must be the part where Ulfric allows Nord war veterans to live on the streets whilst Dunmer refugees live in houses, that damned racist.
Be honest, your generlisation is based on the premise that foreigners should be treated better than natives in their own land, depending on who those natives are.
Well said, friend. I've heard this same BS that the Stormcloaks are somehow racist, yet Skyrim is teeming with non-Nords everywhere. Every race has their land where they dominate the populace, but do the Nords get Skyrim? Oh of course not.
And you all please tell me how welcoming the Snow Elves were to the peaceful Atmorans?
Skyrim is for Nords. Just like every other race has their own land.
I'm confused.Racists you say? They seem to be the most welcoming and accepting racists I've ever saw, though I must be confused, is racism allowing those you hate to live in your city, eat your food, sell your wares, own businesses etc?.. I guess if you're a proud, straight, white male then any sort of self preservation movement is deemed racist, even if you do live in the most diverse city in Skyrim.
Oh wait, was allowing Dunmer to build and keep a huge shrine to Azura the racist part? Or was it Ulfric allowing a High Elf to own the most prestigious property in Windhelm? Could it be the part where Nords work UNDER Elves in Windhelm that's racist? No, no.. It must be the part where Ulfric allows Nord war veterans to live on the streets whilst Dunmer refugees live in houses, that damned racist.
Be honest, your generlisation is based on the premise that foreigners should be treated better than natives in their own land, depending on who those natives are.
Well said, friend. I've heard this same BS that the Stormcloaks are somehow racist, yet Skyrim is teeming with non-Nords everywhere. Every race has their land where they dominate the populace, but do the Nords get Skyrim? Oh of course not.
And you all please tell me how welcoming the Snow Elves were to the peaceful Atmorans?
Skyrim is for Nords. Just like every other race has their own land.
Because another race happens to live in the same place as the supposed "racist", the "racist" is not racist?
Doesn't behaviour determine bigotry, not proximity?
What? You don't have to "remove" a race to be racist. By definition racist means on who practices racism (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism) and that does not necessarily involve forced removal of another race. That would be genocide (if killed).I'm confused.Well said, friend. I've heard this same BS that the Stormcloaks are somehow racist, yet Skyrim is teeming with non-Nords everywhere. Every race has their land where they dominate the populace, but do the Nords get Skyrim? Oh of course not.
And you all please tell me how welcoming the Snow Elves were to the peaceful Atmorans?
Skyrim is for Nords. Just like every other race has their own land.
Because another race happens to live in the same place as the supposed "racist", the "racist" is not racist?
Doesn't behaviour determine bigotry, not proximity?
everyone knows it is not racist unless you are actively trying to get rid of another race/ethnicity. It is obviously the act of removing a race that makes a person racist, not simply having a negative opinion.
/sarcasm
What? You don't have to "remove" a race to be racist. By definition racist means on who practices racism (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism) and that does not necessarily involve forced removal of another race. That would be genocide (if killed).I'm confused.
Because another race happens to live in the same place as the supposed "racist", the "racist" is not racist?
Doesn't behaviour determine bigotry, not proximity?
everyone knows it is not racist unless you are actively trying to get rid of another race/ethnicity. It is obviously the act of removing a race that makes a person racist, not simply having a negative opinion.
/sarcasm