Imperials or Stormcloaks, what one?

  • Welcome to Skyrim Forums! Register now to participate using the 'Sign Up' button on the right. You may now register with your Facebook or Steam account!
J

Jeremius

Guest
Ulfric still has a chance, however slim, of speaking out to the Empire and pointing out the current state of Skyrim. He also, as far as he knows, is saving his men.

Uh, Saving his men? Rebels who were branded traitors for joining the rebellion? You must be on Skooma to think that.
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
My choice might be obvious, but here's my explanation.

I prefer the Imperials and despite some shady activity I think they fight for the greater good and have more noble stances. Upon reviewing their motives and what they do in practice, the Stormcloaks seem worse and in all honesty probably would just plunge Skyrim into chaos. What the Stormcloaks are doing is exactly what the Thalmor want, to divide Skyrim and take over. I agree with the Stormcloaks message that there should be religious freedom to worship whatever, but, it is worth a civil war? I would have a lot more sympathy if they were doing in the name of Freedom from religion, which is fair more maligned in those times to be an atheist than believing the wrong god in a polytheistic society. I think a good compromise however would be to divide Skyrim into two areas instead. The Stormcloaks can keep the east (Windhelm, Winterhold and Riften).

And you don't think what General Tullius is doing is in favor of the Thalmor? The fact that Tullius has precious information indicating that the Civil war was the Thalmor's doing yet continues with this Civil war thus giving them exactly what they desire. Tullius finally releases this information for selfish reasons. Information for an exchange for his life.

Ulfric: "This is it for you. Any last words before I send you to Oblivion?"
Tullius: "You realize this is exactly what they wanted."
Galmar: "What who wanted?"
Tullius: "The Thalmor. They stirred up trouble here. Forced us to divert needed resources and throw away good soldiers quelling this rebellion."
Ulfric: "It's a little more than a rebellion, don't you think?"
Galmar: "Heh."
Tullius: "We aren't the bad guys you know."

If you dig deep into the psychology of a diehard religious person... which is exactly what Ulfric and his Stormcloaks are you would understand that It is worth of going into full blown Civil war. To fight for your heritage and freedom to openly worship Talos.

http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x000c4428
http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x000c4435
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
My choice might be obvious, but here's my explanation.

I prefer the Imperials and despite some shady activity I think they fight for the greater good and have more noble stances. Upon reviewing their motives and what they do in practice, the Stormcloaks seem worse and in all honesty probably would just plunge Skyrim into chaos. What the Stormcloaks are doing is exactly what the Thalmor want, to divide Skyrim and take over. I agree with the Stormcloaks message that there should be religious freedom to worship whatever, but, it is worth a civil war? I would have a lot more sympathy if they were doing in the name of Freedom from religion, which is fair more maligned in those times to be an atheist than believing the wrong god in a polytheistic society. I think a good compromise however would be to divide Skyrim into two areas instead. The Stormcloaks can keep the east (Windhelm, Winterhold and Riften).

And you don't think what General Tullius is doing is in favor of the Thalmor? The fact that Tullius has precious information indicating that the Civil war was the Thalmor's doing yet continues with this Civil war thus giving them exactly what they desire. Tullius finally releases this information for selfish reasons. Information for an exchange for his life.

Ulfric: "This is it for you. Any last words before I send you to Oblivion?"
Tullius: "You realize this is exactly what they wanted."
Galmar: "What who wanted?"
Tullius: "The Thalmor. They stirred up trouble here. Forced us to divert needed resources and throw away good soldiers quelling this rebellion."
Ulfric: "It's a little more than a rebellion, don't you think?"
Galmar: "Heh."
Tullius: "We aren't the bad guys you know."

If you dig deep into the psychology of a diehard religious person... which is exactly what Ulfric and his Stormcloaks are you would understand that It is worth of going into full blown Civil war. To fight for your heritage and freedom to openly worship Talos.

http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x000c4428
http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x000c4435

Considering Ulfric takes forever and Galmar has to jump in to get the execution of Tullius dealt with, and Ulfric wanting the Dragonborn to kill him to "make for a better song", I have a hard time believing that Ulfric cares that much about Talos Worship.
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
Considering Ulfric takes forever and Galmar has to jump in to get the execution of Tullius dealt with, and Ulfric wanting the Dragonborn to kill him to "make for a better song", I have a hard time believing that Ulfric cares that much about Talos Worship.

I don't follow. Care to explain this? How is it allowing the Dragonborn to kill Tullius further proves that Ulfric doesn't care much about Talos worship? You've just now confused me.... to the max.
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
Considering Ulfric takes forever and Galmar has to jump in to get the execution of Tullius dealt with, and Ulfric wanting the Dragonborn to kill him to "make for a better song", I have a hard time believing that Ulfric cares that much about Talos Worship.

I don't follow. Care to explain this? How is it allowing the Dragonborn to kill Tullius further proves that Ulfric doesn't care much about Talos worship? You've just now confused me.... to the max.

I forgot about the who wins the Civil War clause. Ulfric wants the player to him (Ulfric) because it is a better song if you win for the Empire, and he takes forever, drawing out Tullius's execution if you go rebels.

Point was, it seems Ulfric is doing this for Glory, not because of Talos or because it is right, or anything.
 

TheQahnaarin

Son of Skyrim
Ulfric still has a chance, however slim, of speaking out to the Empire and pointing out the current state of Skyrim. He also, as far as he knows, is saving his men.

Uh, Saving his men? Rebels who were branded traitors for joining the rebellion? You must be on Skooma to think that.

There's still a chance, they're soldiers after all.
 

TheQahnaarin

Son of Skyrim
My choice might be obvious, but here's my explanation.

I prefer the Imperials and despite some shady activity I think they fight for the greater good and have more noble stances. Upon reviewing their motives and what they do in practice, the Stormcloaks seem worse and in all honesty probably would just plunge Skyrim into chaos. What the Stormcloaks are doing is exactly what the Thalmor want, to divide Skyrim and take over. I agree with the Stormcloaks message that there should be religious freedom to worship whatever, but, it is worth a civil war? I would have a lot more sympathy if they were doing in the name of Freedom from religion, which is fair more maligned in those times to be an atheist than believing the wrong god in a polytheistic society. I think a good compromise however would be to divide Skyrim into two areas instead. The Stormcloaks can keep the east (Windhelm, Winterhold and Riften).

And you don't think what General Tullius is doing is in favor of the Thalmor? The fact that Tullius has precious information indicating that the Civil war was the Thalmor's doing yet continues with this Civil war thus giving them exactly what they desire. Tullius finally releases this information for selfish reasons. Information for an exchange for his life.

Ulfric: "This is it for you. Any last words before I send you to Oblivion?"
Tullius: "You realize this is exactly what they wanted."
Galmar: "What who wanted?"
Tullius: "The Thalmor. They stirred up trouble here. Forced us to divert needed resources and throw away good soldiers quelling this rebellion."
Ulfric: "It's a little more than a rebellion, don't you think?"
Galmar: "Heh."
Tullius: "We aren't the bad guys you know."

If you dig deep into the psychology of a diehard religious person... which is exactly what Ulfric and his Stormcloaks are you would understand that It is worth of going into full blown Civil war. To fight for your heritage and freedom to openly worship Talos.

http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x000c4428
http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x000c4435

Considering Ulfric takes forever and Galmar has to jump in to get the execution of Tullius dealt with, and Ulfric wanting the Dragonborn to kill him to "make for a better song", I have a hard time believing that Ulfric cares that much about Talos Worship.

I'd say you have a point here except I think if Ulfric were really like that he wouldn't have had a quick, private execution of Tullius. He could have paraded him around like Tullius did with him at Helgen but didn't.
 

TheQahnaarin

Son of Skyrim
My choice might be obvious, but here's my explanation.

I prefer the Imperials and despite some shady activity I think they fight for the greater good and have more noble stances. Upon reviewing their motives and what they do in practice, the Stormcloaks seem worse and in all honesty probably would just plunge Skyrim into chaos. What the Stormcloaks are doing is exactly what the Thalmor want, to divide Skyrim and take over. I agree with the Stormcloaks message that there should be religious freedom to worship whatever, but, it is worth a civil war? I would have a lot more sympathy if they were doing in the name of Freedom from religion, which is fair more maligned in those times to be an atheist than believing the wrong god in a polytheistic society. I think a good compromise however would be to divide Skyrim into two areas instead. The Stormcloaks can keep the east (Windhelm, Winterhold and Riften).

I can see from glancing at your profile you're pro-atheism but you have to respect that Talos has been a way of Nordic life for a very long time. It absolutely is worth a war, I don't think one set of beliefs are worth more than another. The simple fact that someone is trying to take away such a basic right is worth it.
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
I'd say you have a point here except I think if Ulfric were really like that he wouldn't have had a quick, private execution of Tullius. He could have paraded him around like Tullius did with him at Helgen but didn't.

Dragging things out is worse than just killing him, is all I am saying. Plus, How do you know that Ulfric would not parade Tullius around, since it was Galmar who simply wanted to kill Tullius.
 

TheQahnaarin

Son of Skyrim
I'd say you have a point here except I think if Ulfric were really like that he wouldn't have had a quick, private execution of Tullius. He could have paraded him around like Tullius did with him at Helgen but didn't.

Dragging things out is worse than just killing him, is all I am saying. Plus, How do you know that Ulfric would not parade Tullius around, since it was Galmar who simply wanted to kill Tullius.

How is Ulfric really dragging it out anyway? He just won a war as a huge underdog, and he's basically poking fun at himself when he says "where's your sense of the dramatic moment?" because he does try to emulate a hero or stereotypical Nordic King.

Ulfric still planned to do it then and there.

"Any final words before I send you to Oblivion?"
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
I'd say you have a point here except I think if Ulfric were really like that he wouldn't have had a quick, private execution of Tullius. He could have paraded him around like Tullius did with him at Helgen but didn't.

Dragging things out is worse than just killing him, is all I am saying. Plus, How do you know that Ulfric would not parade Tullius around, since it was Galmar who simply wanted to kill Tullius.

How is Ulfric really dragging it out anyway? He just won a war as a huge underdog, and he's basically poking fun at himself when he says "where's your sense of the dramatic moment?" because he does try to emulate a hero or stereotypical Nordic King.

Ulfric still planned to do it then and there.

"Any final words before I send you to Oblivion?"

How do you know? How do you know he wouldn't just drag him out the door and kill him right outside the door?

He seems like a man bent on getting glory.
 

TheQahnaarin

Son of Skyrim
Dragging things out is worse than just killing him, is all I am saying. Plus, How do you know that Ulfric would not parade Tullius around, since it was Galmar who simply wanted to kill Tullius.

How is Ulfric really dragging it out anyway? He just won a war as a huge underdog, and he's basically poking fun at himself when he says "where's your sense of the dramatic moment?" because he does try to emulate a hero or stereotypical Nordic King.

Ulfric still planned to do it then and there.

"Any final words before I send you to Oblivion?"

How do you know? How do you know he wouldn't just drag him out the door and kill him right outside the door?

He seems like a man bent on getting glory.

But he still listens to Galmar.

A man who saw his friends die far from home, lived through Thalmor torture, believes he was responsible for letting the Imperial City fall. He's had it too rough for him to only be chasing a good song.
 

DrunkenMage

Intoxicated Arch-Mage
I'm just saying it's highly unlikely for all of Ulfric's actions to be motivated by a desire to be a martyr. Come on Mage, that "I fight because I must" didn't get to you at all?

No, I don't mean to say all his actions are motivated by that. He does believe in what he is doing, but many of his actions are done for image. Even Galmar gets sick of it at the end of the questline at Castle Dour, when he suggests that you be the one to kill Tullius it he's 'robbing the moment by giving it to the "real" hero'.

To execute every Stormcloak would be to decimate the Eastern Holds population, and take away at least a few legionaires for the next war. You couldn't execute that many people without causing another revolt in the Old Holds.

If they were to renounce the Stormcloaks, it is possible they wouldn't kill them. Laying down their weapons and returning to the fold. The Eastern Holds population would already be slightly decimated after the end of Imperial Victory, given you cut through majority of the Stormcloaks.

They wouldn't just keep them prisoner forever, chances are they'll probably die anyway in jail. Prisons in Tamriel aren't that good and many die in the cells. (Some bodies are still even left in them!). I think being executed would be better than dying in a dark cell from poor health or freezing to death.

Ulfric still has a chance, however slim, of speaking out to the Empire and pointing out the current state of Skyrim. He also, as far as he knows, is saving his men.

They knew they were dead even before they reached Helgen.

Lokir: "Ulfric? The Jarl of Windhelm? You're the leader of the rebellion. But if they've captured you... Oh gods, where are they taking us?"
Ralof: "I don't know where we're going, but Sovngarde awaits."

Ralof: "A Nord's last thoughts should be of home."

Keep in mind as far as revolutions go the Stormcloaks are pretty damn mild. It still is a revolution though, things will get a little extreme, and racial issues will settle down if the Stormcloaks win.

These racial issues are normal, it is the Old Holds. They've always been for Skyrim for the Nords.

Ulfric isn't one to make unnecessary enemies, but right now he doesn't have the time, resources or support to do anything about Windhelm. This is evident when Brunwulf gets up there and he's in the same situation.

Except that the Windhelm issues started when Ulfric became Jarl, years before the rebellion went into full swing. He did nothing when he had the resources, so I doubt he'll do anything when he has them again. It is mentioned his father and his father and so on were better to them.

Ulfric is content to ignore them. Even still, the Dunmer of Windhelm weren't after change right away. They mention that real change takes time, but Brunwulf at least spoke with them and discussed plans.

Ulfric is indeed fighting a rebellion, but he does have Generals. He also has a steward he could use to speak with them about it, they're supposed to run the daily duties of the Hold. Ulfric is focused on Nords, he's a Jarl of the Old Hold. I wouldn't expect anything different, they do not care for non-Nords.

The Old Holds would also end up being influenced by the West, because it's simply unavoidable from how much money they bring in. So after things cool down I'm confident you'll see a more balanced Skyrim.

The Eastern Holds aren't poor. Dawnstar is known for it's rich mines, and it is a port city, Windhelm also has a port and two trading companies stationed there. Riften has hunting for pelts which fetch good prices, and farming thrives in the Rift.

Winterhold I'll grant you is plops poor, but they did rival Solitude before the Great Collapse.

I really think this is Skyrim's one shot at independence. An Imperial victory just kills all nationalism.

Nords bounce back. Skyrim is quite independent, the Holds are independent of each other, and very rarely does the Empire get involved in Skyrim. You can't kill their nationalism, they're a stubborn lot.

Stormcloaks are really a short term solution in the long run, same with the Empire. The Nords have to choose to unite together, conquering one side of Skyrim or the other only keeps them united for a time.


Hammerfell and Cyrodiil were in very similar situations when they signed their treaties. Both devasted, but were facing a devasted army. Cyrodiil essentially fought and won their own resistance when they took back the Imperial City. But the treaties were so drastically different.

The Empire could not continue. The Legions did most of the work, the Redguards didn't do too much until the end. The Empire taking back the Imperial City was hard, very hard. It was a large scale battle against a main army. They weren't doing hit and run, and making Aldmeri rule hell.

Treaties are different because the Empire signed it five years earlier. They couldn't continue the war, the Dominion could. The Redguards fought the Dominion in their lands until they reached a standstill and the Dominion left to recover. By that time the Legions were struggling to bring order back to their lands with all the bandits, gangs, and other groups taking advantage of the lack of Imperial authority.

The Empire could barely maintain order in the peaceful years that followed. Had they continued the war, I doubt they would have ever been able to get order back under control. While the Dominion would just be regaining strength, the Empire would be falling apart due to lack of order.

Kind of what Skyrim is having without the Stormcloaks and Legion fighting. Where you have bandits raiding, rogue wizards doing plops and dangerous creatures getting out of hand.
 

DrunkenMage

Intoxicated Arch-Mage
But he still listens to Galmar.

A man who saw his friends die far from home, lived through Thalmor torture, believes he was responsible for letting the Imperial City fall. He's had it too rough for him to only be chasing a good song.

I personally think his experience and feeling guilty and weak is exactly why he would be after a good song, and caring about his image.

I would say he probably feels unworthy, trying to prove himself in the eyes of his father, the Greybeards, his men, his race. Even I suspect to the Empire. He is fighting a rebellion against them, but in a way he's proving himself to them. That he deserves acknowledgement.

The Thalmor had broken him, taken his dignity. He could be trying to redeem himself to the Gods and the dead in Sovngarde.
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
But he still listens to Galmar.

A man who saw his friends die far from home, lived through Thalmor torture, believes he was responsible for letting the Imperial City fall. He's had it too rough for him to only be chasing a good song.

You sure you support the Stormcloaks? If so, then you need to learn more about the Nords. Ulfric is a Nord, and a warrior at that. It makes sense that he would be seeking a good song, to redeem himself of his capture in the Great War. Song, Glory and Honor, these are the key parts of Nordic Culture.
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
I forgot about the who wins the Civil War clause. Ulfric wants the player to him (Ulfric) because it is a better song if you win for the Empire, and he takes forever, drawing out Tullius's execution if you go rebels.

Point was, it seems Ulfric is doing this for Glory, not because of Talos or because it is right, or anything.

Ulfric is a typical politician so having that self-seeking ideology seems pretty normal for the kind of job that he is in.

If you want to call Ulfric selfish.... go right a head. Hell I will add to the table that I agree that he is selfish... but! His selfishness is not only helping the people of Skyrim, but also himself... since he is fighting to not only rid of Imperial influences, but also fighting for the right to be Skyrim's new High King.
 
J

Jeremius

Guest
I forgot about the who wins the Civil War clause. Ulfric wants the player to him (Ulfric) because it is a better song if you win for the Empire, and he takes forever, drawing out Tullius's execution if you go rebels.

Point was, it seems Ulfric is doing this for Glory, not because of Talos or because it is right, or anything.

Ulfric is a typical politician so having that self-seeking ideology seems pretty normal for the kind of job that he is in.

If you want to call Ulfric selfish.... go right a head. Hell I will add to the table that I agree that he is selfish... but! His selfishness is not only helping the people of Skyrim, but also himself... since he is fighting to not only rid of Imperial influences, but also fighting for the right to be Skyrim's new High King.

Never said it did not, did I? All I said was I do not trust a man who seeks his own glory and song over the humility that humanity SHOULD have.
 

Raijin

A Mage that loves a Templar
I forgot about the who wins the Civil War clause. Ulfric wants the player to him (Ulfric) because it is a better song if you win for the Empire, and he takes forever, drawing out Tullius's execution if you go rebels.

Point was, it seems Ulfric is doing this for Glory, not because of Talos or because it is right, or anything.

Ulfric is a typical politician so having that self-seeking ideology seems pretty normal for the kind of job that he is in.

If you want to call Ulfric selfish.... go right a head. Hell I will add to the table that I agree that he is selfish... but! His selfishness is not only helping the people of Skyrim, but also himself... since he is fighting to not only rid of Imperial influences, but also fighting for the right to be Skyrim's new High King.

Never said it did not, did I? All I said was I do not trust a man who seeks his own glory and song over the humility that humanity SHOULD have.

I never made a big deal over it. In fact I viewed it as humor.
 

Recent chat visitors

Latest posts

Top