To be fair, the game looks somewhat innovative, but a single screenshot gives it away; the most important point that Call of Duty has not improved on: it's the exact same engine. No new engine means no real improvements; just a shinier and modern-looking Quake engine. And they're taking elements from other, more successful games and slapping it onto this decade old technology. Ghosts was "destructible environments" (ala Battlefield 3) and now it's exoskeletons and parkour (ala Titanfall). All hope is lost!
To be fair, the game looks somewhat innovative, but a single screenshot gives it away; the most important point that Call of Duty has not improved on: it's the exact same engine. No new engine means no real improvements; just a shinier and modern-looking Quake engine. And they're taking elements from other, more successful games and slapping it onto this decade old technology. Ghosts was "destructible environments" (ala Battlefield 3) and now it's exoskeletons and parkour (ala Titanfall). All hope is lost!
To be fair, the game looks somewhat innovative, but a single screenshot gives it away; the most important point that Call of Duty has not improved on: it's the exact same engine. No new engine means no real improvements; just a shinier and modern-looking Quake engine. And they're taking elements from other, more successful games and slapping it onto this decade old technology. Ghosts was "destructible environments" (ala Battlefield 3) and now it's exoskeletons and parkour (ala Titanfall). All hope is lost!
